Timeline for (NJ) Can somebody be bound to a contract by not opting out? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5 at 9:15 | history | closed |
Barmar user 55905 Jen Trish End Antisemitic Hate |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jun 24 at 9:30 | comment | added | quarague | It seems like the company believes that when you purchased the home you also took over the contracts related to the house from the former owner. Meaning with the hourse purchase you became party to the contract with them. I don't know what the legality of this argument is. | |
| Jun 20 at 17:18 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 5 at 9:15 | |||||
| Jun 20 at 11:55 | comment | added | MSalters | As a general rule in common-law and civil-law countries alike, contracts require a " meeting of minds" or at least a similar concept: a mutual understanding of what agreement they want to enter. It definitely can't be a contract renewal, because that would renew the previous contract with the previous owner. | |
| Jun 20 at 1:17 | history | edited | ohwilleke |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 19 at 23:46 | history | edited | Anonymouse123 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 79 characters in body
|
| S Jun 19 at 23:39 | review | First questions | |||
| Jun 20 at 1:35 | |||||
| S Jun 19 at 23:39 | history | asked | Anonymouse123 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |