Timeline for How does gambling on something when you have non-public information become cheating?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25 at 1:41 | answer | added | thelawnet | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 13 at 22:05 | answer | added | Lag | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 13 at 15:08 | comment | added | Michael Hall | "May" is generally defined as whatever the prosection is able to convince a jury of. (Would it be cheating to bet on the verdict?!) | |
| Jun 13 at 14:23 | comment | added | User65535 | @Lag No, because there is a massive "may" in there. What factors feed into that "may"? | |
| Jun 13 at 14:21 | comment | added | Lag | Isn't this answered by the Gambling Commission spokesperson you quoted? "If someone uses confidential information in order to gain an unfair advantage when betting, this may constitute an offence of cheating under section 42 of the Gambling Act, which is a criminal offence." | |
| Jun 13 at 14:05 | history | edited | User65535 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified aides position as per guardian article
|
| Jun 13 at 13:54 | history | asked | User65535 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |