Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • Interesting thing would be to create an AI model completely absent from any content filtering (incl. bias of its creators), but having some capability to "think about" the possible biases of all his sources.
    – Gray Sheep
    Commented Jun 4 at 3:00
  • The main issues with creating an AI LLM are whether it used copyrighted content in an infringing matter to train it - which is an interesting way to put it given that generally it's held that training is inherently fair use (although this hasn't been fully litigated yet). Commented Jun 5 at 22:32
  • 3
    @Clockwork-Muse "given that generally it's held that training is inherently fair use" This is not at all a generally held belief and is indeed a hotly debated issue which is the subject of pending litigation.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jun 5 at 22:59
  • @Clockwork-Muse An analysis of the current debate over fair use in the context of AI training can be found in a recent law review article at papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4834410
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jun 5 at 23:55