Edit - Law Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7

You should make it more explicit that the case is not about paying his money - it’s about treating personal expenses as business expenses.
– Dale M ♦
Commented Apr 27 at 4:57
1

All these “hush money” allegations are completely missing the point. Donald Trump was and is perfectly entitled to pay money from his own pocket to prevent news from coming out (probably not to prevent evidence of crimes to come out). If his company pays instead, that should be treated as income and he should pay income tax on it.
– gnasher729
Commented Apr 27 at 14:35
2

@gnasher729 - as long as it is reported as a campaign expenditure, if it is.
– George White
Commented Apr 28 at 4:43

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »