Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 20 at 14:00 comment added Brian @bdb484: Red Hat's rather circuitous approach to protecting their source code suggests that their lawyers think I'm right (or at least close to right that a legal battle would be difficult or expensive). Were it legal, Red Hat would have certainly definitely preferred OP's strategy. Both approaches are equally reputationally damaging.
Mar 18 at 17:09 comment added bdb484 To be clear, I think it's entirely possible you're right. I just think the answer is less certain than people seem to realize.
Mar 18 at 17:09 comment added bdb484 I'm not sure that that provision overrides all of contract law. I can say all sorts of things about what you may or may not do; saying it doesn't make it true.
Mar 18 at 13:03 comment added Brian @bdb484: Because it does. You can't restrict others from exercising the things the license permits. Quoting the license: "Each time you convey a covered work, the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensors, to run, modify and propagate that work, subject to this License. [...] You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the rights granted or affirmed under this License. "
Mar 16 at 2:26 comment added bdb484 @Brian Why do you say that?
Mar 15 at 18:52 history edited Keltari CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
Mar 15 at 14:15 comment added Brian "So does that license prohibit forming contracts with people not to do things it permits? " - Yes, it does.
Mar 14 at 16:19 history edited Keltari CC BY-SA 4.0
added 26 characters in body
Mar 14 at 14:48 comment added interfect Yes. So does that license prohibit forming contracts with people not to do things it permits? Or am I not allowed to agree with you that you will stop sending CDs with my software to my house, because the GPL requires that I not form these restrictive ancillary agreements?
Mar 14 at 14:43 history answered Keltari CC BY-SA 4.0