Timeline for What to do with tutorial requests? -- part II
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2018 at 21:03 | history | edited | user82991 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Feb 21, 2018 at 12:47 | comment | added | Welz | Regarding your suggestion in chat: That would require a new SE community all-together but you can make a new A51 proposal. | |
| Feb 21, 2018 at 9:46 | history | edited | user82991 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Feb 21, 2018 at 9:17 | history | edited | user82991 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1726 characters in body
|
| Feb 18, 2018 at 7:54 | history | edited | user82991 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
| Feb 17, 2018 at 23:35 | comment | added | user82991 | @Vincent I cleaned the text. BTW. How can you feel you are included to so called in-group? That group do not exist and at least I am the opponent of its birth. | |
| Feb 17, 2018 at 23:19 | history | edited | user82991 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 105 characters in body
|
| Feb 17, 2018 at 23:02 | history | edited | user82991 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Feb 17, 2018 at 22:55 | comment | added | Vincent | Maybe there is no hostility towards me personally, but there certainly is against this 'in-group' you mention. Me being both a mod and a high-rep member, it's pretty hard not to feel included in that group. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 20:16 | comment | added | user9447 | But the issue with this user continuing to offer TOD is it gives other askers the incentive to say "so-so did it" and "I saw that qa there that did it". | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 19:20 | comment | added | Welz | There is no owner of this site, the site is run by the community. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 17:40 | comment | added | user82991 | @Vincent About hostility: That's not personal. As you wrote, I regularly answer to questions. This is nothing new. I gave too receipes how to stop low quality questions and how to effectively stop those answers which are given to those low quality questions. and inspire more low quality questions to flow in. That was technical guidance.. We can change "in-group" to "accrediteds" and "artistic insight" to "care of quality" . | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 16:51 | comment | added | Vincent | I have asked for your opinion here because, yes, I have seen you regularly answer questions that I see as lazy TOD. I honestly wanted your opinion on the matter because you seem to enjoy giving those answers and I don't want to take away that pleasure or deny honest beginners your answers. Your opinion is clear, but I also feel a lot of hostility coming from you that I don't know where it originates. No 'artistic insight' is required, and I read another accusation of elitism in that remark, which I really don't understand nor appreciate if it is indeed that. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 16:41 | comment | added | user82991 | @Vincent I think that you called me to this conversation just because I have given quite many on-demand technical receipes. to people who have asked "how do I do this". Right? I have done it for fun, to help the beginners and often also to get it clear for myself. I admit that if some deeper artistic insight was a must, I would have written much less. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 16:10 | comment | added | Vincent | I downvoted you answer. I'm sorry if I sound oversensitive, but I really don't appreciate you talking about an 'in-group'. To me, it suggests that you feel that 'we' (who?) are arrogant elite and you aren't. This is simply not true. As zeethreepio says, we are all here, together to improve everyone's design skill. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 16:03 | comment | added | user82991 | @zeethreepio 1)low enough rep would stop automatically rep collectors to write, they would go elsewhere.. 2) People who like their own writings would not to stop writing before someone prevents them. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 16:01 | comment | added | Jongware | @zeethreepio: but acquiring rep points enables one to participate more – viz. commenting, voting, editing, closing, deleting, all the way up to almost moderator privileges. It's a metric of how good a user's participation is. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 15:58 | comment | added | zeethreepio | This site isn't about collecting rep points. Yes, it's a nice motivator and validation, but the idea is to make the graphic design community stronger. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 15:35 | comment | added | Jongware | Isn't this by and by what the current system already does? High reputation members can vote to close and delete questions; they can also upvote questions, moving low-rep users into 'their' ranks. And, as on all Stack Exchange sites, users who post too many badly received questions will automatically get banned by the system. | |
| Feb 16, 2018 at 15:20 | history | answered | user82991 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |