Discussion elements

[Ipuch]

Need to add a section in the discussion / limitations:

• On frame Reporting. Detailed on frames are not reported if the landmarks were obtained through palpation, functional identification, optimization, or by clicking through a mesh interface.
  example: if a center of rotation is identified through a Score method, it's a functional method, but it refers to the center of rotation of a joint, so we consider we were looking for the anatomical site.

• Reperes segementaires trop exotiques
  Sahara et al 2006 : The scapula coordinate system is the clavicle coordinate system at abduction zero degree. The scapua frame is very exotic and not convertable to ISB standards.

• Angles articulaires

• Certains auteurs proposent des méthodes non standard :

• Projection methods : Guttierez

• Mettre les autres

• Rythme thoracohumeral vs glenohumeral , raison technologique, ou pins no reason.

• Charbonnier

• Dal Maso

• Zhang

• Methodes de corrections:

• Sulkar et al 2001 huméral ISB distal -> landmarks distaux

• Methode de correction manquante qui ISB to glene.

• Removed Graichen and Hallstrom

• How do we know that our dataset is better than skin markers data? Does the data with offset still better than skin markers data ?