Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 27, 2016 at 20:20 vote accept Eric
Jan 27, 2016 at 20:18 answer added ed.hank timeline score: 1
Jan 27, 2016 at 19:18 comment added ed.hank That makes sense to me!
Jan 27, 2016 at 19:06 comment added Eric Also, I will give the roads proper classification when I migrate into a proper data model.
Jan 27, 2016 at 19:03 comment added Eric They will be tied into the road network, but I am thinking I'll set them up without any addressing, so that the buildings get the address directly from the highway. The name will look something like "Hwy 52 Service Rd." so that people will have an idea that it's a service road directly off of a major highway. Does this make sense?
Jan 27, 2016 at 18:32 comment added Mapperz classification of the road would be better than renaming roads 'service road' is generic
Jan 27, 2016 at 17:51 comment added RHB {Sorry, this should be a comment, but I'm not allowed to comment} moderator moved to comments >. If your road network needs to function as a network, i.e., routing and cartographic representations, the service roads will need to be built into the road network just like all the other roads. (Maybe I am reading too much into your question.)
Jan 27, 2016 at 17:23 comment added Eric That is what I was thinking of doing, thanks for your reply!
Jan 27, 2016 at 16:38 comment added ed.hank Here those roads are called Frontage Roads. So the road that runs along side I-35 is simply I-35 NB Frontage for the northbound, SB for the southbound. I am not sure if that is a universal naming method or not.
Jan 27, 2016 at 16:30 history asked Eric CC BY-SA 3.0