Timeline for On tags and places
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2017 at 14:19 | history | edited | Harry V.Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 464 characters in body
|
| May 11, 2017 at 10:40 | comment | added | AndyW | I broadly agree with this, but there may be ambiguity problems with only a provincial name - e.g. Northumberland is a county in both England and Australia. (One could use an additional country tag for disambiguation, or some parallel set of tags for similarly-named places. Both approaches, though, are messy - overloaded tags versus too many tags). | |
| May 8, 2017 at 20:02 | comment | added | PolyGeo Mod | I would agree so I think your answer and mine distill to the same thing. | |
| May 8, 2017 at 13:22 | comment | added | Harry V. Mod | @PolyGeo That's a special case. The usefulness of such tags ought to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Generally I would say avoid city tags unless there is a compelling argument for their use. | |
| May 8, 2017 at 7:55 | comment | added | PolyGeo Mod | What would you do with the new-york-city tag which is neither a country or county/state/province? | |
| May 4, 2017 at 15:35 | history | answered | Harry V.Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |