Skip to main content
clarification
Source Link
cori
  • 3.4k
  • 2
  • 22
  • 20

I see some references to that, toostatus as uncountable as well, but that doesn't make much sense to me. I've always used statii, apparently incorrectly: Merriam-Webster, at least, calls for "statuses"

I see some references to that, too, but that doesn't make much sense to me. I've always used statii, apparently incorrectly: Merriam-Webster, at least, calls for "statuses"

I see some references to status as uncountable as well, but that doesn't make much sense to me. I've always used statii, apparently incorrectly: Merriam-Webster, at least, calls for "statuses"

Source Link
cori
  • 3.4k
  • 2
  • 22
  • 20

I see some references to that, too, but that doesn't make much sense to me. I've always used statii, apparently incorrectly: Merriam-Webster, at least, calls for "statuses"