Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 9, 2020 at 17:35 history edited MWB CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 3 characters in body
Aug 9, 2020 at 16:15 history edited MWB CC BY-SA 4.0
added 11 characters in body; edited tags
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 28, 2018 at 3:32 review Close votes
Apr 29, 2018 at 2:26
Apr 27, 2018 at 23:06 history edited MWB CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Jun 2, 2016 at 8:36 vote accept MWB
May 19, 2016 at 4:51 history edited MWB CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
May 19, 2016 at 1:45 history edited MWB CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body
May 19, 2016 at 1:31 history tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/733107686879858689
May 18, 2016 at 18:47 answer added Phil Sweet timeline score: 8
May 18, 2016 at 18:07 comment added Phil Sweet Poking around the web, I found one chunky example of what you are describing under the section title "Voluminous disclaimer and sidenote with historical digressions:" At least they are honest about it. Linky
May 18, 2016 at 5:36 answer added NVZ timeline score: 5
May 18, 2016 at 4:30 comment added user140086 Political correctness? I am not sure if I can post an answer with this.
May 18, 2016 at 3:10 history edited MWB CC BY-SA 3.0
added 70 characters in body
May 18, 2016 at 2:56 history edited MWB CC BY-SA 3.0
added 28 characters in body
May 18, 2016 at 2:54 comment added anongoodnurse Being blunt implies lack of verbosity. Being tactful may not necessarily imply verbosity, but certainly a softening of the message may mean more words.
May 18, 2016 at 2:53 comment added MWB @medica I don't think tact implies verbosity, does it?
May 18, 2016 at 2:52 comment added anongoodnurse Tact comes to mind. I don't think it's necessarily negative. I think you might be referring more to political correctness, though.
May 18, 2016 at 2:51 history asked MWB CC BY-SA 3.0