Timeline for Is it okay to pluralize the word "status"? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2021 at 21:19 | comment | added | funder7 | I agree with lux, to me the word "states" sounds more right to pronounce, but it may be wrong. I'd like to hear what an english speaking person thinks about it. | |
| May 10, 2016 at 22:08 | history | closed |
Kris tchrist♦ ab2 Nathaniel is protesting Hellion |
Not suitable for this site | |
| May 6, 2016 at 18:41 | comment | added | lux | What about "states"? | |
| May 6, 2016 at 14:32 | answer | added | frank | timeline score: -1 | |
| May 6, 2016 at 12:36 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 10, 2016 at 22:08 | |||||
| May 6, 2016 at 12:36 | comment | added | Kris | Duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/q/877/14666 "What is the plural form of "status"?" | |
| May 6, 2016 at 12:20 | comment | added | Kris | Please see a good dictionary. | |
| May 6, 2016 at 12:07 | comment | added | Hot Licks | It's done, and generally accepted, at least in less formal writings. | |
| May 6, 2016 at 11:58 | answer | added | WS2 | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 6, 2016 at 11:49 | answer | added | Nick | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 6, 2016 at 11:34 | history | asked | Wuvex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |