Timeline for Safer alternative to “opaque”?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2015 at 0:29 | vote | accept | Spiff | ||
| Jan 30, 2015 at 13:32 | comment | added | El Suscriptor Justiciero | I'd suggest that, if you call it "totally opaque", you also address how that "totally" is totally redundant. | |
| Jan 30, 2015 at 1:09 | comment | added | kapex | "fully opaque" is also used a lot | |
| Jan 30, 2015 at 0:57 | comment | added | James | "Absolutely" or "completely opaque" | |
| Jan 29, 2015 at 20:36 | comment | added | Hot Licks | "Totally opaque" is probably the most direct way to avoid the OP's anxiety. | |
| Jan 29, 2015 at 19:17 | comment | added | user66974 | I think that the problem is just the 'supposedly misunderstood' meaning of opaque!! | |
| Jan 29, 2015 at 19:16 | history | answered | Centaurus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |