Jump to content

Template talk:Pagelist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Module talk:Pagelist)

Request to implement editorproof version

[edit]

{{editprotected}} I recommend to implement the code on {{Pagelist/sandbox}}. See Template_talk:Merge#Problem_when_using_with_templates for the reason, and that I tested this. Debresser (talk) 06:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Cheers,  Skomorokh, barbarian  07:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am so proud. Thank you. Debresser (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Version which allows use of multiple namespaces

[edit]

There's an example of this template at MediaWiki.org with an additional setting allowing you to use each parameter's namespace rather than one standard namespace for all pages: mw:Template:Pagelist --Varnent (talk) 01:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Range support

[edit]

Hi,

I've added backward-compatible support for beginning and ending ranges: Template:Pagelist/sandboxRange

New parameters:

  • begin - beginning of the page range; defaults to 1
  • end - end of the page range
  • preLink - content to add at the beginning the link; defaults to empty string
  • postLink - content to add at the beginning the link; defaults to empty string

I'm not sure what the page object is about so I don't know if the new preLink/postLink params should tie into that at all, but at least the new code shouldn't break anything. Brettz9 (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback, if not incorporation into the existing template would be most welcome! Brettz9 (talk) 00:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some improvment

[edit]

@Mr. Stradivarius: Hi! Maybe some functionality could be added to module? What I mean is to make changes, so it could be used in this kind of templates, where there is something more to the page link. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 06:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Edgars2007: Sure, go ahead! As long as the existing functionality is kept intact it should be fine. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 08:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Stradivarius: ha-ha :) Actually, I wanted to know, if you could make those changes, as I'm sure it won't be a problem to you. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 10:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

[edit]

Could the default standard for this module to return the namespace of the page it is used on be removed? I'm trying to fix a long-standing issue with Template:Merge, and I think the resolution would be to replace all instances of [[:{{{nspace|{{NAMESPACE}}}}}:{{PAGENAME:{{{NUMBER}}}}}|{{{NUMBER}}}]] with [[:{{{NUMBER}}}]] (if this template weren't Lua-ized), but I have no idea how to do that same task on the Lua module. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: You would do this. But might this change not break some of the existing transclusions? I don't know why the original template did it that way, but perhaps some pages somewhere are relying on that behaviour. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Stradivarius: I was thinking the same. This change would potentially negatively affect all pages that transclude this template that are in any namespace other that the article namespace. However, I noticed that there are about 12000 transclusions, but I noticed that most of them (probably 95% of them) are in the article space. I'm planning on picking through the ones in the non-article spaces here in a few and force the use of the nspace= parameter in them so that this change can happen with no negative effects. Steel1943 (talk) 03:24, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
...And since I now realized that forcing the nspace= parameter is technically impossible (without editing every template that transcludes {{Pagelinks}}), I'm now going to attempt to compile a list of pages (a count) of the amount of pages that could negatively be affected by this change. The only other option would be a three-step process where first, all templates that transclude {{Pagelinks}} are edited to allow the nspace= parameter to be utilized, force the parameter in all transclusions of the template (that are not templates themselves), then perform the edit I requested. But, unless this edit happens, it's technically impossible to list pages from multiple namespaces in this template. Steel1943 (talk) 03:34, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, at this point, I'm probably going to work on removing/fixing all non-article namespace transclusions. I've been doing so right now, and am actually probably close to being done. I'll update this section when I am done, or run across a complication. Steel1943 (talk) 04:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to mark this "answered" until I can figure out/fix the non-article space transclusions. (That, and I actually don't want to completely remove the nspace= parameter as my request above is suggesting. I'm going to revisit this after I fix the existing non-article space transclusions.) Steel1943 (talk) 04:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford commas, please

[edit]

This template prints the last two article names separated by " and ". It would be helpful to use ", and " instead. The main reason is that "and" is often a word within an article name, so failure to set off the conjunction with a comma can confuse readers by implying that the last two names are a single article name. Link coloring is not always a sufficient visual cue.

Example: {{Pagelist|nspace=w|Frick and Frack|Mutt and Jeff|Madonna|Child}}

Current output: Frick and Frack, Mutt and Jeff, Madonna and Child.

Desired output: Frick and Frack, Mutt and Jeff, Madonna, and Child.

Please consider implementing this as an option rather than a change to default behavior, because lists with only two items should not be separated by commas. This change should not break any existing usage. — ob C. alias ALAROB 14:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can use |conjunction=:
{{Pagelist|nspace=w|conjunction=, and |Frick and Frack|Mutt and Jeff|Madonna|Child}}.
Frick and Frack, Mutt and Jeff, Madonna, and Child. Alakzi (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Alakzi. — ob C. alias ALAROB 15:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the conjunction parameter already existed and I overlooked the guidance in Help. I did read it before making the request, but apprently I didn’t comprehend it.
I find that I have to add a non-breaking space after ", and " because a space will be ignored, as here:
{{pagelist |nspace=w|conjunction=, and |Muslim population growth|Ali|The Conversation of Eiros and Charmion}}
Muslim population growth, Ali, andThe Conversation of Eiros and Charmion
Same thing happens if I paste your demo:
{{Pagelist|nspace=w|conjunction=, and |Frick and Frack|Mutt and Jeff|Madonna|Child}}.
Frick and Frack, Mutt and Jeff, Madonna, andChild.
But this works: {{Pagelist|nspace=w|conjunction=, and&nbsp;|Frick and Frack|Mutt and Jeff|Madonna|Child}}</nowiki>
Why are you and I getting different results? — ob C. alias ALAROB 16:00, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We're not; I used alt-space to type a non-breaking space because it's quicker. It gets copied as a regular space. Apologies for the confusion. Alakzi (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To add, there's no workaround for this—that I know of; leading and trailing whitespace inside parameters always gets stripped. Alakzi (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. That did the trick. Thanks. — ob C. alias ALAROB 16:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This didn't really resolve the issue. See next thread.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  03:41, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serial comma default when 3+ list items

[edit]

This should use the serial (a.k.a. Oxford) comma by default when there are three or more items. This often produces difficult-to-parse output because of the lack of this comma, and virtually no one is going to manually inject one with a special parameter. Even American style guides like Chicago Manual of Style recommend the use of a serial comma in any case where it aids comprehension, so its use is not "against the rules" anywhere. The |conjunction= parameter is of broken utility anyway, since it will also insert a comma before "and" when there are only two items, which is almost never desirable (only when the two items are complex and contain their own punuctation, in which case a semicolon is often better anyway).  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼