Talk:SliTaz

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the TazLiTo page were merged into SliTaz. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (3 October 2017)

I realized after i created this page that it should probably have just been named "SliTaz". Can someone please do the redirection? -Monz (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the notability challenge, which the author didn't even bother to justify. Slitaz is a functional mini-Linux (I've tried it), and we have similar projects like Puppy Linux here on Wikipedia. Maikel (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SliTaz with Midori Browser work best on my Laptop/1000 Mhz/256 MB RAM with a Belkin PCMCIA Card. The Browser functions fast. The other small Linux, (except TinyCore), has problems with the old video card on the Laptop. The others are still functional. This Linux O/S has worked the best for me, and I have tried many. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easeltine (talk • contribs) 16:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, I am writing this from a Dell Inspiron 8000/1 GHz Coppermine/256 MB RAM SliTaz 4.0 from a Live CD. It works great, and makes this Article NOTABLE. I might even be considered a reliable 3rd Party!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.30.184 (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of high-brow language is "Nobility Challenge?" I can understand linux but I guess I'm not educated enough

in bureaucratic-speak to know what Nobility Challenge is. I say the lady doth protest too much.

Lets use simple language and get off our high horse so we can make a decision. Either way the world isn't going to end.

That would be nice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.85.42 (talk) 21:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed two categories: Knoppix and Source based Linux distros.

If these categories were in fact accurate, then we need a source and a mention of it in the article (e.g. say that SliTaz is source- or Knoppix-based in the article, and back it up with a source). Otherwise, the article doesn't belong in those categories.

However, I am fairly certain both of these are inaccurate. SliTaz has its own package manager and the word "Knoppix" doesn't appear anywhere on their website.

Attys (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]