Jump to content

User:Coretheapple: Difference between revisions

This user helped get "1963 Chualar bus crash" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "All the Way (play)" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Alvin "Shipwreck" Kelly" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "German Concentration Camps Factual Survey" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Joan McCracken" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Johnny Broderick" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "LeRoy Prinz" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Michael Kidd" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "My Italian Secret: The Forgotten Heroes" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user contributed substantially to "Joan McCracken" become a good article on March 8, 2014.
This user created "Johnny Broderick" become a good article on July 17, 2014.
This user created "LeRoy Prinz" become a good article on July 8, 2014.
This user contributed substantially to "Michael Kidd" become a good article on July 8, 2014.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Why 'driving them underground' is a nonsense argument: a case study: I don't need this on my talk page; it is a Foundation problem; let them fix it
Line 133: Line 133:
==Why fixing vandalism is important==
==Why fixing vandalism is important==
Because if not fixed immediately, '''it may never be fixed.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Max_Gordon_%28producer%29&diff=636921457&oldid=628668521 Here] are fixes of vandalism I made to the article of a prominent theatrical producer. The vandalism was committed in February 2014. I caught it, purely by accident, 10 months later.
Because if not fixed immediately, '''it may never be fixed.''' [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Max_Gordon_%28producer%29&diff=636921457&oldid=628668521 Here] are fixes of vandalism I made to the article of a prominent theatrical producer. The vandalism was committed in February 2014. I caught it, purely by accident, 10 months later.

==Why 'driving them underground' is a nonsense argument: a case study==
The "paid editing" imbroglio has been dormant for most of the past few months, but while it's still fresh in my mind I wanted to address one of the arguments that one hears frequently: which is that stiff action against paid editors will "drive them underground."

This argument reeks of the "bigotry of low expectations." It implies, and in fact pretty much says flat-out, that paid editors are sociopaths who will violate a website's terms of use, and that paid editing as a kind of ideological or sociological phenomenon, like drug abuse. In fact paid editors are (with a few exceptions) rational actors driven by commercial considerations. They are not sociopaths or scalawags. Take strong action against paid editors, I have maintained, and the most likely result is that they will go away.

With the passage of time, a good illustrative example has come to mind. To avoid naming specific companies and editors, let's call it the [[Acme Finance Company]] (h/t to [[Bugs Bunny]]).

For a period of several months, editors openly affiliated with the Acme Finance Company had been plaguing the article about Acme: intimidating non-Acme editors, engaging in rampant sockpuppeting, dominating [[Talk:Acme Finance Company]], and generally making a nuisance of themselves. Efforts by non-Acme editors to rectify the situation ran into a wall of abuse and stonewalling, which was a situation of serious public concern because Acme had some serious regulatory issues that the Acme editors, and their socks, had managed to banish from the article.

The issue finally came up at [[WP:ANI]]. This time, in the face of clear evidence of sockpuppeting, the Acme editors were indefinitely blocked. One editor, an administrator I'm sorry to say, argued strenuously against taking action, on the grounds that Acme editors would be "driven underground." But even he or she gave up, and the editors were indefinitely blocked.

It's been five months since the events I've described above happened. And what has occurred. Has there been any sockpuppeting of any kind in the article? Any indication that the Acme editors have been "driven underground"? The answer:''' No.''' In fact, the article in question has been absolutely quiet since the socks, including the declared Acme editor, were indefinitely blocked.

What this indicates to me is that Acme officials decided that fighting this out in the pages of Wikipedia was just not worth the trouble. Wikipedia had been a "soft target" but no longer was. So they didn't "go underground" and continue a fruitless battle that might have resulted in untoward publicity. They just went away.


==Awards & recognition==
==Awards & recognition==

Revision as of 15:14, 30 July 2015

About me
This user is a recipient of the Editor of the Week award.
This editor is a Veteran Editor II and is entitled to display this Bronze Editor Star.
This user has helped promote 4 good articles on Wikipedia.
This user has written or expanded 9 articles featured in the Did You Know section on the Main Page.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
Wikipedia:HuggleThis user uses Huggle to revert vandalism.
QThis user used to have access to Questia through The Wikipedia Library.
?This user believes
that common sense is
an uncommon commodity.


This user beats vandals with the STiki anti-vandal tool.
Because of real life, this user will be editing on and off.
This user disapproves of mindless PR firm sockpuppets spreading paid POV around Wikipedia.
This user is a member of the Paid Advocacy Watch Project (WP:PAIDWATCH)
This user is signed up for the Feedback Request Service.
This user is a WikiJanitor.
This user is a member of
the Guild of Copy Editors.
WikiProject DanceThis user participates in
WikiProject Dance.
This user simplifies Wikipedia referencing with ProveIt.
SBThis user lets SuggestBot recommend articles to edit once a month.


:(This user makes multiple typographical errors and has to keep going back to fix them, so please be patient with him or her.
This editor is not an administrator and does not wish to be one.
This editor does not edit for personal gain, and believes doing so is unethical and should be banned.

Articles I've created or have made substantial contributions

I am also active in suggesting articles for deletion and, when my eyes can stand it, vandal-fighting. I think that de-crapifying Wikipedia is at least as important as adding content. Wikipedia is a hotbed of fancruft, self-written articles by employees of third-rate companies, and overemphasis on subjects plucked off the Internet. It greatly underemphasizes subjects of great importance that don't have a fan base or following.

To do list

Useful links

But can it core a apple?[1]
  • Special:Getting Started. It is a list of articles in obvious trouble that even beginners can fix. I've found some instances where the articles are so bad they really shouldn't be in Wikipedia at all. Editing these articles results in a tag branding the editor as a "beginner getting started," but you can avoid that by copying and pasting the URL of the articles listed there.
  • "STiki", a really great counter-vandalism tool, crated by the awesome, brilliant software maven Andrew G. West. Every Wikipedian should spend a few minutes a day using this.


Why fixing vandalism is important

Because if not fixed immediately, it may never be fixed. Here are fixes of vandalism I made to the article of a prominent theatrical producer. The vandalism was committed in February 2014. I caught it, purely by accident, 10 months later.

Awards & recognition

Teahouse First Birthday Badge Teahouse First Birthday Badge
Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year!

To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


First place winner of the 2013 Wikipedia apple coring contest!!!
It is so good to work with you at the BP article. I hope you stick around. Gandydancer (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)


Mind the Gap Award
For saying the right thing, at the right time, in the right place, to the right people. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar

Congratulations, Coretheapple! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Pratyya (Hello!) 05:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


The Original Barnstar
An old school barnstar for an old school defense of old school values at Jimbotalk. Don't be afraid to think outside of the box, sometimes the most effective course of action is an enforceable compromise. best, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


understanding for the slippery slope
Thank you, gnome with understanding for "consensus", "common sense" and the slippery slope, for removing puffery statements, moving pages, fighting vandalism, standing up in kindness, and for expressing your regrets, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)




The Editor's Barnstar
Your common sense approach is refreshing. Keep up the good work!!! Atsme (talk) 23:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


The Bronze STiki Barnstar of Merit
Congratulations, Coretheapple! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 5,000 classification threshold using STiki.

We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool.

We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)






Thank you for your help at WP:ANI and for helping me get a sense of perspective on my talkpage. The vitriol shocked me for a second. Rest assured, I will continue to go and improve the encyclopedia. :) OrigamitePlease talk here 00:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


The Anti-Flame Barnstar
Your week seems to have been just lousy with acrimony and bad energy involving tendentious editors, seemingly as a consequence, at least in part, of dedicated efforts at WP:ANI. For keeping your calm and staying on point, I offer you one of the most well-earned barnstars I've yet awarded. Made from asbestos, same as your hide. ;) Snow (talk) 10:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for "old school values and a common sense approach focused on what will help Wikipedia survive the long haul". Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)


The Civility Barnstar
You are awesome! Atlantictire (talk) 19:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)





Tools

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Coretheapple&oldid=673797455"