Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Nicholls: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Morning277 (talk | contribs)
→‎Steve Nicholls: Adding comment with additional sources.
Morning277 (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:
**'''Note''' I found the CNN link. It's a [http://schoolsofthought.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/26/my-view-dont-ban-social-media-from-schools/ blog post]. Nothing wrong with that, but does little in my view to help establish notability. We need independent third party references '''about''' Mr. Nicholls to help with that.--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] ([[User talk:Jimbo Wales|talk]]) 14:39, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
**'''Note''' I found the CNN link. It's a [http://schoolsofthought.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/26/my-view-dont-ban-social-media-from-schools/ blog post]. Nothing wrong with that, but does little in my view to help establish notability. We need independent third party references '''about''' Mr. Nicholls to help with that.--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] ([[User talk:Jimbo Wales|talk]]) 14:39, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
:::'''Additional Citations''' - I agree that there must be independent and reliable sources to support notability. I found additional sources that I believe count towards notability. There is one of him giving an interview on Money Sense Radio where he is cited as a "pioneer in social media for business."[http://moneysenseradio.com/2012/07/steve-nicholls-social-media-in-business-2/] He is also featured in Industry News Weekly.[http://www.industryweek.com/leadership/10-essential-social-media-tips-senior-executives] The Courier Journal quotes him in an article (this is borderline passing mention but I believe that it would help establish notability).[http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20120725/BETTERLIFE01/307250078/JERE-DOWNS-better-life-social-media-business] Here is an article in Tech Journal that quotes him.[http://www.techjournal.org/2012/07/taking-a-broader-view-of-social-media-can-change-industries/] There is one from Philly.com but it is a reprint of the St.Louse dispatch (not to be used as an additional source but I believe it lends more credibility to the St. Louis Dispatch article that is cited by Carrite below.[http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-30/business/32942931_1_social-media-small-business-jobvite]--[[User:Morning277|Morning277]] ([[User talk:Morning277|talk]]) 15:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
:::'''Additional Citations''' - I agree that there must be independent and reliable sources to support notability. I found additional sources that I believe count towards notability. There is one of him giving an interview on Money Sense Radio where he is cited as a "pioneer in social media for business."[http://moneysenseradio.com/2012/07/steve-nicholls-social-media-in-business-2/] He is also featured in Industry News Weekly.[http://www.industryweek.com/leadership/10-essential-social-media-tips-senior-executives] The Courier Journal quotes him in an article (this is borderline passing mention but I believe that it would help establish notability).[http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20120725/BETTERLIFE01/307250078/JERE-DOWNS-better-life-social-media-business] Here is an article in Tech Journal that quotes him.[http://www.techjournal.org/2012/07/taking-a-broader-view-of-social-media-can-change-industries/] There is one from Philly.com but it is a reprint of the St.Louse dispatch (not to be used as an additional source but I believe it lends more credibility to the St. Louis Dispatch article that is cited by Carrite below.[http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-30/business/32942931_1_social-media-small-business-jobvite]--[[User:Morning277|Morning277]] ([[User talk:Morning277|talk]]) 15:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
::::::It is actually the Courier Journal cited by Carrite so I believe the St. Louis Dispatch could be counted as an additional source. --[[User:Morning277|Morning277]] ([[User talk:Morning277|talk]]) 15:36, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. 16:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)</small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. 16:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)</small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)</small>



Revision as of 15:36, 16 August 2012

Steve Nicholls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article reads like an advertisement. A search of the Internet for more information suggests strongly that the subject is not notable in the sense of Wikipedia. Jimbo Wales (talk) 12:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I concur. Having searched for spelling variations, I have noticed that our similarly-titled articles Steve Nichols and Stephen Nichols are also poorly-sourced, so to anyone searching, please keep a note of any sources you come across related to them as well as him.—S Marshall T/C 12:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless much better third-party verifiability of noteworthiness comes up - David Gerard (talk) 12:53, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - A search has found numerous sources that were not originally in the article. High Beam comes up short but a search of Google for "Steve Nicholls social media" brings up sources such as Industry Week and CNN news. There are many Steve Nicholls out there so you need to narrow your search by putting more than just his name in the search. --Morning277 (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note Morning277 is the original creator and sole-author of this article. Perhaps it would be helpful to explain how you came across Mr. Nicholls and made the decision to make a biography about him, so that we might better understand the claim of notability.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. I did not realize who recommended the deletion. Regardless, I believe that the article does meet notability guidelines. I came across the article Here after looking up books on social media. I came across his book, then him, then Wiki. Was surprised as I thought the original article was good but it was denied due to lack of sources as the only ones it contained were self published I believe. I am writing from my phone so when I get to a computer I will do more research and hopefully come up with more reliable sources. Also, as you say it is written like an ad, any suggestions on how to make it read less like an ad would be appreciated. Thanks. --Morning277 (talk) 14:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Additional Citations - I agree that there must be independent and reliable sources to support notability. I found additional sources that I believe count towards notability. There is one of him giving an interview on Money Sense Radio where he is cited as a "pioneer in social media for business."[1] He is also featured in Industry News Weekly.[2] The Courier Journal quotes him in an article (this is borderline passing mention but I believe that it would help establish notability).[3] Here is an article in Tech Journal that quotes him.[4] There is one from Philly.com but it is a reprint of the St.Louse dispatch (not to be used as an additional source but I believe it lends more credibility to the St. Louis Dispatch article that is cited by Carrite below.[5]--Morning277 (talk) 15:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is actually the Courier Journal cited by Carrite so I believe the St. Louis Dispatch could be counted as an additional source. --Morning277 (talk) 15:36, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 16:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The book might squeak by wp:notability but this is not an article on the book I saw no suitable coverage on the individual. The writing looks like a pure advertisement/resume. North8000 (talk) 17:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]