Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎2023 Arbitration Committee: Adding links to talk page sections (bot)
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Adjusting links to archived content
 
(356 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{/Header}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{/Header}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|counter = 13
|counter =
|algo = old(20d)
|algo = old(20d)
|maxarchivesize = 200K
|maxarchivesize = 200K
Line 9: Line 9:
}}
}}


== Conflict of interest VRT consultations, July 2024 ==
== Twsabin unblocked ==


The Arbitration Committee has received applications for [[WP:COIVRT|conflict of interest VRT queue]] access and has reviewed them in consultation with the [[Wikipedia:Functionaries|functionaries team]]. The Community is invited to evaluate the candidacies and comment [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Conflict of interest reports/July 2024 appointments|here]] until the end of 17 July 2024 (UTC).
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, {{user|Twsabin}} is unblocked. Twsabin is indefinitely topic banned from post-1992 American politics, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed.


For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 00:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Committee, [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]]) 00:, (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Twsabin unblocked}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 00:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
: at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard| }}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 00:, (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


== ''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stephen|Stephen]]'' arbitration case closed ==
== Arbitration ==


The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1234165816#Motion: Durova|motion]] that:
The ''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stephen|Stephen]]'' arbitration case has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedy has been enacted:
{{ivmbox|Principle 2 of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Durova]], ''Private correspondence'', is changed from<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) <s>or their lapse into public domain</s>, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. <s>See Wikipedia:Copyrights.</s>}}<br>to<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.}}}}
Arbitration Committee
[[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]]&nbsp;[[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]] 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration }}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) :, (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


== Resignation of Barkeep49 from ArbCom ==
*The administrative permissions of Stephen are restored.


I resign as Arbitrator effective immediately. I will be retaining Oversight and giving up Checkuser. It's clear I am no longer at my best as an arbitrator and so rather than waiting for [[:m:U4C|U4C]] to achieve quorum before resigning - as I [[Special:Diff/1173982217|still believe]] we should have no rule against serving on both but that it would be foolish in the extreme for a person to do both - I have made the decision to step down from ArbCom now. I look forward to focusing all my energies on the U4C and the ways outside of ArbCom I am able to help Wikipedia. Thank you to the community for electing me, I hope those who supported me felt like I honored their trust and thanks to my current and former colleagues from whom I learned so much. It has truly been an honor to serve. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 02:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Dreamy Jazz|Dreamy <i style="color:#d00">'''Jazz'''</i>]] <sup>''[[User talk:Dreamy Jazz|talk to me]]'' &#124; ''[[Special:Contribs/Dreamy Jazz|my contributions]]''</sup> 23:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Stephen arbitration case closed}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 23:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard| }}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) :, (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


== Arbitration motion regarding Suspension of Beeblebrox ==
== Contentious topics procedure adopted ==


The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:Permalink/1235135750#Motion: Suspension of Beeblebrox|motion]] that:
The Arbitration Committee has concluded the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021-22 review|2021-22 review]] of the contentious topics system (formerly known as [[WP:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]]), and its final decision is viewable at the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021-22 review|revision process page]]. As part of the review process, the Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions/2021-22_review/Proposed_decision#Motion_to_close|motion]] that:
{{ivmbox|1=The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 14#Suspension of Beeblebrox|November announcement of the suspension of Beeblebrox]] is amended to remove the sentence {{tqq|These failures followed a previous formal warning issued to Beeblebrox in September 2021 by the Arbitration Committee concerning his conduct in off-wiki forums.}} and insert in its place the sentence {{tqq|In September 2021, within the scope of internal Committee discussions, Beeblebrox was advised that his off-wiki conduct was suboptimal.}}}}
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:|]] ([[:|talk]]) 21, (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard| }}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:, (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


== Release of the 2021 letter to Just Step Sideways ==
{{ivmbox|1=The above proposals that are supported by an absolute majority of unrecused active arbitrators are hereby enacted. The drafting arbitrators (CaptainEek, L235, and Wugapodes) are directed to take the actions necessary to bring the proposals enacted by this motion into effect, including by amending the procedures at [[WP:AC/P]] and [[WP:AC/DS]]. The authority granted to the drafting arbitrators by this motion expires one month after enactment.


The Arbitration Committee attaches the following addendum to its [[Special:Diff/1235136231|previous announcement]] regarding the suspension of Beeblebrox, also known as Just Step Sideways:
The Arbitration Committee thanks all those who have participated in the [[WP:DS2022|2021-22 discretionary sanctions review process]] and all who have helped bring it to a successful conclusion. This motion concludes the 2021-22 discretionary sanctions review process.
}}
This motion initiates a one-month implementation period for the updates to the contentious topics system. The Arbitration Committee will announce when the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021-22 review/Implementation|initial implementation]] of the Committee's decision has concluded and the amendments made by the drafting arbitrators in accordance with the Committee's decision take effect. Any editors interested in the implementation process are invited to assist at [[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021-22 review/Implementation|the implementation talk page]], and editors interested in updates may subscribe to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/2021-22 review/Update list|update list]].


{{cot|Redacted contents of the 2021 letter}}
For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 21:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Dear Beeblebrox,
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Contentious topics procedure adopted}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 21:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


I'm writing to you on behalf of the rest of the committee, after {{redacted}}.
== Iranian Politics disruption continues ==


Your plain speaking is appreciated, however there have been a couple of occasions that comments made in public risk compromising the faith the community puts in arbitrators to conduct arbitration fairly. Two important traits the community expects us to be are to be (a) discreet and (b) scrupulous/fair.
The Arbitration Committee has been made aware by the Wikimedia Foundation's disinformation team of continued disruption in the Iranian Politics (IRANPOL) topic area, which was subject to an [[w:en:Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Iranian politics#Final decision|ArbCom case]] last year. Additional measures to address this disruption may be forthcoming in the year ahead from the Arbitration Committee and/or the Wikimedia Foundation. For now, the Arbitration Committee is informing the community of this disruption in the hopes that more editors and administrators may wish to begin working in the IRANPOL topic area. Uninvolved administrators are also reminded that [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions#Placing_sanctions_and_page_restrictions|editor restrictions and page restrictions]] are available for use in the topic area. For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 17:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Iranian Politics disruption continues}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 17:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->


Mocking another editor (albeit one currently indefinitely blocked on en-wiki) on a Wikipedia criticism site is not compatible with fairness, and candid comments about differences in opinion concerning {{redacted}} and {{redacted}} are not compatible with discretion.
== 2023 Arbitration Committee ==


Outside the public comments, your recent message to the functionaries list regarding {{redacted}} has caused significant consternation amongst editors there. Whilst you may not have realised {{redacted}}, the tone used in regard to another contributor who is participating in good faith was also not compatible with scrupulous behaviour.
The Arbitration Committee welcomes the following new and returning arbitrators following their [[:en:WP:ACE2022|election]] by the community. The two-year terms of these arbitrators formally begin on 1 January 2023:
* {{userlinks|Barkeep49}}
* {{userlinks|CaptainEek}}
* {{userlinks|GeneralNotability}}
* {{userlinks|Guerillero}}
* {{userlinks|L235}}
* {{userlinks|Moneytrees}}
* {{userlinks|Primefac}}
* {{userlinks|SilkTork}}


Can you please be really really careful in situations where a public comment (a) may reveal or hint at private committee discussion, or (b) come across as denigrating, mocking or flippantly dismissing another person's concerns, or other ad hominem comments, in all fora, but particularly if made on Wikipediocracy.
All incoming arbitrators have elected to receive the checkuser and oversight permissions.


For the Arbitration Committee,
The Committee will make a further announcement about outgoing arbitrators before the 2023 Committee takes office.
{{cob}}


Support: Aoidh, Barkeep49, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree
For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 22:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|2023 Arbitration Committee}}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) 22:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->
Oppose: CaptainEek, Maxim, Primefac, Z1720

Abstain: HJ Mitchell

On behalf of the Committee, [[User:Sdrqaz|Sdrqaz]] ([[User talk:Sdrqaz|talk]]) 22:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
: Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard| }}'''<!-- [[User:ArbClerkBot|ArbClerkBot]] ([[User talk:ArbClerkBot|talk]]) :, (UTC) --><!--Template:hes-->

Latest revision as of 19:25, 18 July 2024

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:
  • 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
  • 1 (to 2009-02)
  • 2 (to 2009-05)
  • 3 (to 2009-06)
  • 4 (to 2009-07)
  • 5 (to 2009-12)
  • 6 (to 2010-12)
  • 7 (to 2011-12)
  • 8 (to 2012-12)
  • 9 (to 2013-12)
  • 10 (to 2015-12)
  • 11 (to 2018-04)
  • 12 (to 2020-08)
  • 13 (to 2023-03)
  • 14 (to present)

Conflict of interest VRT consultations, July 2024

The Arbitration Committee has received applications for conflict of interest VRT queue access and has reviewed them in consultation with the functionaries team. The Community is invited to evaluate the candidacies and comment here until the end of 17 July 2024 (UTC).

On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Conflict of interest VRT consultations, July 2024

Arbitration motion regarding Durova

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

Principle 2 of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Durova, Private correspondence, is changed from
2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See Wikipedia:Copyrights.
to
2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.

For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Durova

Resignation of Barkeep49 from ArbCom

I resign as Arbitrator effective immediately. I will be retaining Oversight and giving up Checkuser. It's clear I am no longer at my best as an arbitrator and so rather than waiting for U4C to achieve quorum before resigning - as I still believe we should have no rule against serving on both but that it would be foolish in the extreme for a person to do both - I have made the decision to step down from ArbCom now. I look forward to focusing all my energies on the U4C and the ways outside of ArbCom I am able to help Wikipedia. Thank you to the community for electing me, I hope those who supported me felt like I honored their trust and thanks to my current and former colleagues from whom I learned so much. It has truly been an honor to serve. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Resignation of Barkeep49 from ArbCom

Arbitration motion regarding Suspension of Beeblebrox

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The November announcement of the suspension of Beeblebrox is amended to remove the sentence These failures followed a previous formal warning issued to Beeblebrox in September 2021 by the Arbitration Committee concerning his conduct in off-wiki forums. and insert in its place the sentence In September 2021, within the scope of internal Committee discussions, Beeblebrox was advised that his off-wiki conduct was suboptimal.

For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh (talk) 21:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Suspension of Beeblebrox

Release of the 2021 letter to Just Step Sideways

The Arbitration Committee attaches the following addendum to its previous announcement regarding the suspension of Beeblebrox, also known as Just Step Sideways:

Redacted contents of the 2021 letter

Dear Beeblebrox,

I'm writing to you on behalf of the rest of the committee, after (Redacted).

Your plain speaking is appreciated, however there have been a couple of occasions that comments made in public risk compromising the faith the community puts in arbitrators to conduct arbitration fairly. Two important traits the community expects us to be are to be (a) discreet and (b) scrupulous/fair.

Mocking another editor (albeit one currently indefinitely blocked on en-wiki) on a Wikipedia criticism site is not compatible with fairness, and candid comments about differences in opinion concerning (Redacted) and (Redacted) are not compatible with discretion.

Outside the public comments, your recent message to the functionaries list regarding (Redacted) has caused significant consternation amongst editors there. Whilst you may not have realised (Redacted), the tone used in regard to another contributor who is participating in good faith was also not compatible with scrupulous behaviour.

Can you please be really really careful in situations where a public comment (a) may reveal or hint at private committee discussion, or (b) come across as denigrating, mocking or flippantly dismissing another person's concerns, or other ad hominem comments, in all fora, but particularly if made on Wikipediocracy.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Support: Aoidh, Barkeep49, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree

Oppose: CaptainEek, Maxim, Primefac, Z1720

Abstain: HJ Mitchell

On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 22:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Release of the 2021 letter to Just Step Sideways