Seany91
Joined 25 March 2020
Latest comment: 11 days ago by Kingsif in topic July 2024
July 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonatan Giráldez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. I have soft-reverted your edits, reinstating all of the perfectly valid information that you had no reason or explanation to remove, while taking your updates and now correctly stating that Giráldez took over on paper on 7 July. That is all you needed to do - any further inexplicably broad removals of information with no explanation given will be considered deliberate vandalism. Kingsif (talk) 21:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's clear that my edits were not vandalism, given that my edits include clear summaries and sources. If there are concerns, please actually state them. Thanks. Seany91 (talk) 22:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- As I actually stated, your edits removed a lot of information that had nothing to do with the date Giráldez took over, and you gave no explanation for removing this information. You are free to provide an explanation or start a discussion. Kingsif (talk) 22:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I did. Seany91 (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- You clearly didn't actually look at what you removed. Kingsif (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I actually did. Thanks for questioning my reading comprehension. Seany91 (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm replying on the talkpage breaking down your edits, but either you genuinely believe you have explained everything and didn't read what you removed, or you're lying. Because a lot of stuff you removed, no explanation. Kingsif (talk) 22:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, as you should. Seany91 (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, and separate but on the same article - you're supposed to start talkpage discussions for prose issues before adding warning tags. I'd be impressed if you could find content to quote for puffery, though, the article really manages to be bland about nigh indomitability. Kingsif (talk) 22:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, as you should. Seany91 (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm replying on the talkpage breaking down your edits, but either you genuinely believe you have explained everything and didn't read what you removed, or you're lying. Because a lot of stuff you removed, no explanation. Kingsif (talk) 22:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I actually did. Thanks for questioning my reading comprehension. Seany91 (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- You clearly didn't actually look at what you removed. Kingsif (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I did. Seany91 (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- As I actually stated, your edits removed a lot of information that had nothing to do with the date Giráldez took over, and you gave no explanation for removing this information. You are free to provide an explanation or start a discussion. Kingsif (talk) 22:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)