Content deleted Content added
Senorangel (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 96:
*::You have been repeatedly asked to leave me alone and should. The least useful contributions in this discussion are your attempts to hound a guy just trying to prompt discussion out of "go read something elsewhere" comments. Those are the comments I've been replying to. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 11:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
*:::{{u|Kingsif}}, you don't get to determine how talk page discussions take place on articles, and I am allowed to comment on your harassment of other editors. Considering you are the one making baseless sockpuppetry accusations above, you need to stop with your actual [[WP:PA|personal attacks]]. – [[User:Notwally|notwally]] ([[User talk:Notwally|talk]]) 18:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
*'''No''', what's wrong with keeping mention of it in the second sentence? I don't see how changing its position that slightly will make a meaningful difference in improving article quality. [[User:RFZYNSPY|<span style="color:orange;">RFZYN</span><span style="color:purple;">SPY</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:RFZYNSPY|<span style="color:blue;">talk</span>]]</sup> 19:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' — As of July 1, 2024, there are 511 words of "readable prose size", with approximately 80% of those words related to the rape conviction. Seems like to me that the only reason this article primarily exists is to disparage its subject. If that is indeed the aim of this article, then it shouldn't even exist. As for the first sentence, '''No''' it shouldn't be included there, as there is absolutely ''no way'' with the majority of the article dedicated to the conviction, our readers won't be able to understand that he is a convicted rapist, without it being said in the first sentence.[[User:Isaidnoway|<b style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:blue"> ''Isaidnoway'' </b>]][[User talk:Isaidnoway|<b style="font-family:Times New Roman; color:#03B54F">''(talk)''</b>]] 10:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||