Content deleted Content added
→July 2024: Reply |
|||
Line 16:
::::::::Yup, and separate but on the same article - you're supposed to start talkpage discussions for prose issues before adding warning tags. I'd be impressed if you could find content to quote for puffery, though, the article really manages to be bland about nigh indomitability. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 22:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::There's no hard requirements about having discussions before adding tags. I followed [[WP:BRD]] and if you have issues with that you could bring them up respectfully as opposed to calling other people's edits "ridiculous." [[User:Seany91|Seany91]] ([[User talk:Seany91#top|talk]]) 22:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Ah, well, 1. apologies for my last revert that I marked as procedural. 2. I have made that detailed reply at the article talkpage, and you have not responded. I do not think it is proper for you to be reinstating your version of content while there's a discussion open that it seems like you're ignoring. 3. BRD is eminently questionable here, as both of us could claim that the other's edits were bold, we reverted. But again, you're not taking part in the discussion.
::::::::::And 4. full disclosure, I said "ridiculous" because I felt, but would never want to accuse, that you just didn't like some of the unrelated content, couldn't think of a reason for removal, so deleted it while making legit changes and hoped the legit changes would cover for you. So instead I said "ridiculous", and if you would actually discuss the changes, I will graciously apologise. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 23:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||