I am confused in using the noun 'surprise':
"If I tell you the truth, you'll be surprised" AND
"If I tell you the truth, you'll get surprised."
Do we use 'be surprised' and 'get surprised' in specific cases or they are the same?
Thank You.
I am confused in using the noun 'surprise':
"If I tell you the truth, you'll be surprised" AND
"If I tell you the truth, you'll get surprised."
Do we use 'be surprised' and 'get surprised' in specific cases or they are the same?
Thank You.
I'm a native speaker of US English and cannot recall hearing or seeing the phrase "get surprised" in ordinary discourse. I would be surprised if a native speaker of English used that phrase.
The concept of "surprise" entails knowing or experiencing something that you had not expected to observe, and it has the connotation of a change in state (from unawareness to awareness) rather than a state in which you remain. (It is hard to "stay surprised" by something once you're aware of it.) Hence to "be surprised" already has the connotations that phrases such as "get surprised" or "become surprised" might have if they were idiomatic English. I think that is probably why I always expect to hear the verb "be" rather than another verb such as "get" in that context.
Note that it is possible to say "I am always surprised when I get a good grade," but that has more the sense of repeated surprise than continual surprise; if I said that, it would mean that in between the times when I receive grades, I always expect my next grade to be a poor one.
Your question is actually about the adjective "surprised".
To my ear (native British speaker), "get surprised" sounds a little unnatural but the distinction would be that "you will be surprised" refers to being in a state of surprise, whereas "you will get surprised" refers to entering a state of surprise. In the example in the question, there's not much difference since, if I tell you the truth, you will enter a state of surprise and then be in a state of surprise for a few moments.