Timeline for Capacitance variation with applied voltage
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2023 at 13:03 | comment | added | Vladimir Cravero | NP0 or COG are not suitable for decoupling, unless you have both lots of space on your PCB, and lots of money in your wallet. X5R/X7R are what is normally used for decoupling. | |
| Jun 26, 2023 at 13:01 | comment | added | Confused | @RYR051,so do we need to use NPO or COG caps for decoupling | |
| Jun 26, 2023 at 12:22 | comment | added | RYR051 | Good call on Y5V being class 2. I have corrected my answer | |
| Jun 26, 2023 at 12:20 | history | edited | RYR051 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2023 at 0:47 | comment | added | DKNguyen | @quantum231 Just because you do a lot of research doesn't mean you'll invent the perfect <insert anything here>. And that's even before you include cost in the criteria. It's greatly taking things for granted to think this should be the case. | |
| Jun 25, 2023 at 21:05 | vote | accept | quantum231 | ||
| Jun 25, 2023 at 17:44 | comment | added | quantum231 | With so much research going on in the world, is it true that we have not come up with cheaper materials that give great advantages like high capacitance of capacitance over voltage, temperature and signal frequency? | |
| Jun 25, 2023 at 12:33 | comment | added | Hearth | Y5V is still class II; class III materials can't be made into multilayer capacitors and are obsolete. | |
| Jun 25, 2023 at 2:43 | history | answered | RYR051 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |