Timeline for Is a balancing diode really necessary for the Balanced Boost converter?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 29, 2022 at 8:57 | history | bounty ended | MicroservicesOnDDD | ||
Jan 29, 2022 at 8:57 | vote | accept | MicroservicesOnDDD | ||
Jan 28, 2022 at 17:21 | history | edited | rdtsc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Reworked entire answer with updated sim.
|
Jan 28, 2022 at 17:14 | history | edited | rdtsc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Reworked entire answer with updated sim.
|
Jan 26, 2022 at 21:25 | comment | added | MicroservicesOnDDD | I also added a capacitor just like C27 and C41 on the Traditional Boost (but I'm not sure it belongs). And finally, I changed 470u to 480u on Traditional, all 100u to 120u, and 120u couplings to 0.99 on both Balanced, to try to more evenly match the inductances. And my inductors are not real ones. | |
Jan 26, 2022 at 21:22 | comment | added | MicroservicesOnDDD | I entered your testbench before you added the file source code to your very nice answer. I was wondering why my output was different from yours, and then I found that the three models are cross-connected via V2, V4, V6, and the gates of all 3 MOSFETs on Label G1, which I have as Labels V2, V4, and V6 on my testbench. | |
Jan 26, 2022 at 20:46 | comment | added | Antonio51 | Have tried "harmonic" analysis. For D2, It is "pertinent" and clearly very "useful". | |
Jan 26, 2022 at 19:54 | history | edited | rdtsc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added LTspice .ASC file.
|
Jan 26, 2022 at 16:59 | history | answered | rdtsc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |