Timeline for Why do some switching regulator require tantalum or electrolytic capacitors instead of ceramic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 at 12:29 | comment | added | sstobbe | MLCCs often have a strong voltage coefficient for capacitance and may lose 90% of the capacitance at their rated working voltage. | |
| Oct 18, 2019 at 9:31 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Oct 18, 2019 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/1185118471266426880 | ||
| Oct 18, 2019 at 5:25 | history | edited | Neil_UK | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
it's
|
| Oct 18, 2019 at 2:16 | vote | accept | dos584 | ||
| Oct 18, 2019 at 1:50 | answer | added | user57037 | timeline score: 36 | |
| Oct 18, 2019 at 1:42 | comment | added | Hearth | I don't have the time to type up a proper answer, but this is generally due to requiring a certain minimum ESR for stability. | |
| Oct 18, 2019 at 1:27 | history | asked | dos584 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |