Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-assisted reading of mammograms

  • Breast Radiology
  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Techniques developed in computer vision and automated pattern recognition can be applied to assist radiologists in reading mammograms. With the introduction of direct digital mammography this will become a feasible approach. A radiologist in breast cancer screening can use findings of the computer as a second opinion, or as a pointer to suspicious regions. This may increase the sensitivity and specificity of screening programs, and it may avoid the need for double reading. In this paper methods which have been developed for automated detection of mammographic abnormalities are reviewed. Programs for detecting microcalcification clusters and stellate lesions have reached a level of performance which makes application in practice viable. Current programs for recognition of masses and asymmetry perform less well. Large-scale studies still have to demonstrate if radiologists in a screening situation can deal with the relatively large number of false positives which are marked by computer programs, where the number of normal cases is much higher than in observer experiments conducted thus far.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baines CJ, McFarlane DV, Miller AB (1990) The role of the reference radiologist: estimates of inter-observer agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national breast screening study. Invest Radiol 25: 971–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184: 613–617

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harvey JE, Fajardo LL, Inis CA (1993) Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. AJR 161: 1167–1172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dijck JAM van, Verbeek LM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (1993) The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. Cancer 72 (6): 1933–1938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gale A, Wilson ARM, Roebuck EJ (1993) Mammographic screening: radiologic performance as a precursor to image processing. In: Proc First int Workshop on Digital Mammography, SPIE vol 1905, pp 458–464

  6. Savage CJ, Gale AG, Pawley EF, Wilson ARM (1994) To err is human, to compute divine? In: Proc Second Int Workshop on Digital Mammography, Elsevier Int Congr Series 1069, pp 405–414

  7. Vyborny CJ (1994) Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 191: 313–317

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krupinski EA, Nodine CF (1994) Gaze duration predicts the locations of missed lesions in mammography. In: Gale AG (ed) Digital mammography. Elsevier Int Congr Series 1069, pp 399–405

  9. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Lam KL, Ogura T, Wu Y, Macmahon H (1990) Improvement in radiologist's detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Invest Radiol 25: 1102–1110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Astley S, Hutt I, Adamson S, Rose P, Miller P, Boggis C, Taylor C, Valentine T, Davies J (1993) Automation in mammography: computer vision and human perception. In: Proc First Int Workshop on Digital Mammography, SPIE 1905, pp 716–730

  11. Kegelmeyer WP Jr, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML (1994) Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191: 331–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Lam KL, Schmidt RA (1988) Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Invest Radiol 23: 664–671

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Davies DH, Dance DR (1990) Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 35: 1111–1118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Astley SM, Taylor CJ (1990) Combining cues for mammographic abnormalities. Proc First British Mach. Vision Confl, pp 253–258

  15. Karssemeijer N (1992) A stochastic model for automated detection of calcifications in digital mammograms. Image Vision Comput 10: 369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karssemeijer N (1993) Adaptive noise equalization and detection of microcalcification clusters in mammography. IJPRAI 7: 1357–1367

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kegelmeyer WP Jr, Allmen MC (1994) Dense feature maps for detection of calcifications. In: Gale AG (ed) Digital mammography. Elsevier Int Congr Series 1069, pp 3–12

  18. Netsch T (1996) Detection of microcalcification clusters in digital mammograms: a scale-space approach. In: Arnolds B et al. (eds) Digitale Bildverarbeitung in der Medizin. GMDS, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strickland RN, Hahn HI (1996) Wavelet' transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15: 218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau TK, Bischof WF (1991) Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. Comput Biomed Res 24: 273–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng SL, Bischof WF (1992) Automated detection and classification of breast tumors. Comput Biol Res 25: pp 218–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller P, Astley S (1993) Detection of asymmetry using anatomical features. Proc First Int Workshop on Digital Mammography, SPIE 1905, pp 433–442

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brzakovic D, Brzakovic P, Neskovic M (1993) An approach to automated screening of mammograms. Proc First Int Workshop on Digital Mammography, SPIE 1905, pp 690–701

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA (1994) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of masses and clustered microcalcifications from digital mammograms. In: Bowyer K, Astley S (eds) State of art in digital mammographic image analysis. World Scientific, Machine Perception and AI 9, Singapore, pp 82–103

  25. Giger ML, Lu P, Huo Z, Bick U, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Zhang W, Metz CE, Wolverton D, Nishikawa RM, Zouras W, Doi K (1994) CAD in digital mammography: computerized detection and classification of masses. In: Gale AG (ed) Digital mammography. Elsevier Int Congr Series 1069, pp 281–288

  26. Petrick N, Chan HP, Sahiner B, Wei D (1996) An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15: 59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kegelmeyer WP Jr (1992) Computer detection of stellate lesions in mammograms. Proc Biomedical Image Processing and 3-D Microscopy, SPIE 1660, pp 446–454

    Google Scholar 

  28. Woods KS, Bowyer KW (1994) Computer detection of stellate lesions. In: Gale AG (ed) Digital mammography. Elsevier Int Congr Series 1069, pp 221–230

  29. Suckling J, Parker J, Dance DR, Astley S, Hutt I, Boggis CRM, Ricketts I, Stamatakis E, Cerneaz N, Kok SL, Taylor P, Betal D, Savage J (1994) The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Proc Second Int Workshop on Digital Mammography. Elsevier Int Congr Series 1069, pp 375–378

  30. Swets J, Pickett RM (1982) The evaluation of diagnostic systems: methods from signal detection theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Karssemeijer N (1995) Detection of stellate distortion in mammograms using scale space operators. In: Bizais Y, Barillot C, Paola R di (eds) Information processing in medical imaging. Computational imaging and vision 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 335–346

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chakraborty DP, Winter LHL (1990) Free response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 174: 873–881

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S (1993) Report of the international workshop on screening for breast cancer. JNCI 85: 1644–1656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, NL-6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    N. Karssemeijer & J. H. C. L. Hendriks

Authors
  1. N. Karssemeijer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. H. C. L. Hendriks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karssemeijer, N., Hendriks, J.H.C.L. Computer-assisted reading of mammograms. Eur. Radiol. 7, 743–748 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742937

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742937

Key words

Search

Navigation