An Examination of Sexual Offenses Against Women by Acquaintances: The Utility of a Script Framework for Prevention Purposes

• Atkenson, B. M., Calhoun, K. S., & Morris, K. T. (1989). Victim resistance to rape: The relationship of previous victimization, demographics and situational factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18(6), 498–507.

  Google Scholar 

• Banyard, V. L. (2008). Measurement and correlates of prosocial bystander behaviour: The case of interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 23, 83–97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beauregard, E., & Leclerc, B. (2007). An application of the rational choice approach to the offending process of sex offenders: A closer look at the decision making. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 115–133.

  Google Scholar 

• Beauregard, E., Lussier, P., & Proulx, J. (2005). The role of sexual interests and situational factors on rapists’ modus operandi: Implications for offender profiling. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 265–278.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beauregard, E., Proulx, J., Rossmo, K., Leclerc, B., & Allaire, J.-F. (2007). Script analysis of the hunting process of serial sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1069–1084.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beauregard, E., Rebocho, M. F., & Rossmo, K. (2010). Target selection patterns in rape. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 137–152.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beauregard, E., Rossmo, K., & Proulx, J. (2007). A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial offenders: A rational choice perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 449–463.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

  Google Scholar 

• Bownes, I., O’Gorman, E., & Sayers, A. (1991). Rape—A comparison of stranger and acquaintance assaults. Medical, Science and Law, 31, 102–109.

  Google Scholar 

• Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1978). A theoretical model of crime site selection. In M. Krohn & R. Akers (Eds.), Crime law and sanctions (pp. 105–118). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Chiu, Y.-N., Leclerc, B., & Townsley, M. (2011). Crime script analysis of drug manufacturing in clandestine laboratories: Implications for prevention. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 355–374.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 6). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Clarke, R. V., & Eck, J. E. (2005). Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 small steps. Washington, DC: Office of Community Orientated Policing Services, US Department of Justice.

  Google Scholar 

• Clarke, R. V., & Newman, G. R. (2006). Outsmarting the terrorists. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.

  Google Scholar 

• Clay-Warner, J. (2002). Avoiding rape: The effects of protective actions and situational factors on rape outcomes. Violence and Victims, 17, 691–705.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cornish, D. B. (1994). The procedural analysis of offending and its relevance for situational prevention. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (Vol. 3). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York, NY: Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2002). Analyzing organized crimes. In A. Piquero & S. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behaviour. London, UK: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2008). The rational choice perspective. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

  Google Scholar 

• Cusson, M. (1983). Why delinquency? Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Deslauriers-Varin, N., & Beauregard, E. (2010). Victim’s routine activities and sex offenders’ target selection scripts: A latent class analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 315–342.

  Google Scholar 

• Felson, M. (2008). Routine activity approach. In R. Wortley & L. Mazerolle (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

  Google Scholar 

• Gibson, L., Linden, R., & Johnson, S. (1980). A situational theory of rape. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 22, 51–65.

  Google Scholar 

• Hale, R. (1997). Motives of reward among men who rape. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 101–119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones, J., Wynn, B., Kroeze, B., Dunnuck, C., & Rossman, L. (2004). Comparison of sexual assaults by stranger versus known assailants in a community-based population. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22, 454–459.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kilpatrick, D. G., Edmunds, C. N., & Seymour, A. K. (1992). Rape in America: A report to the nation. Arlington, VA: National Victim Center.

  Google Scholar 

• Koss, M. P. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 198–212.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., & Seibel, C. A. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lea, S. J., Hunt, L., & Shaw, S. (2011). Sexual assault of older women by strangers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2303–2320.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leclerc, B., & Cale, J. (2015). Weapon use and sexual abuse outcomes: A multivariate and conjunctive analysis of sexual offenses against women. Security Journal, 28, 54–70.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Leclerc, B., Smallbone, S., & Wortley, R. (2013). Interpersonal scripts and victim reaction in child sexual abuse: A quantitative analysis of the offender-victim interchange. In B. Leclerc & R. Wortley (Eds.), Cognition and crime: Offender decision-making and script analyses. London, UK: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Leclerc, B., Wortley, R., & Smallbone, S. (2011). Getting into the script of adult child sex offenders and mapping out situational prevention measures. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 209–237.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Levi, M., & Maguire, M. (2004). Reducing and preventing organised crime: An evidence-based critique. Crime, Law & Social Change, 41, 397–469.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mann, R. E., & Hollin, C. R. (2007). Sexual offenders’ explanations for their offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 3–9.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Myhill, A., & Allen, J. (2002). Rape and sexual assault of women: The extent and nature of the problem (Home Office research study, Vol. 237). London, UK: Home Office.

  Google Scholar 

• Park, J., Schlesinger, L. B., Pinizzotto, A. J., & Davis, E. F. (2008). Serial and single-victim rapists: Differences in crime-scene violence, interpersonal involvement, and criminal sophistication. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26, 227–237.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Porter, L. E. (2008). Using archival data and multidimensional scaling to explore leadership: Examples from group crime. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 8, 33–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Porter, L., & Alison, L. (2004). Behavioral coherence in violent group activity: An interpersonal model of sexually violent gang behavior. Aggressive Behaviour, 30, 449–468.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stermac, L., Du Mont, J., & Kalemba, V. (1995). Comparisons of sexual assaults by stranger and known assailants in an urban population of women. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 153, 1089–1094.

  Google Scholar 

• Stevens, D. J. (1994). Predatory rapists and victim selection techniques. The Social Science Journal, 31, 421–433.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of intimate partner violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  Google Scholar 

• Ullman, S. E., & Knight, R. A. (1991). A multivariate model for predicting rape and physical injury outcomes during sexual assaults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 724–731.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ullman, S. E., & Knight, R. A. (1992). Fighting back: Women’s resistance to rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 31–43.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ullman, S. E., & Knight, R. A. (1995). Women’s resistance strategies to different rapist types. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 263–283.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ullman, S. E., & Siegel, J. M. (1993). Victim-offender relationship and sexual assault. Violence and Victims, 8, 121–134.

  Google Scholar 

• Waldo, G. P., & Dinitz, S. (1967). Personality attributes of the criminal: An analysis of research studies, 1950–1965. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 4, 185–202.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walsh, D. (1978). Shoplifting: Controlling a major crime. London, UK: Macmillan.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Willmer, M. A. P. (1970). Crime and information theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Woods, L., & Porter, L. (2008). Examining the relationship between sexual offenders and their victims: Interpersonal differences between stranger and non-stranger sexual offenses. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 61–75.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references