Local Orientation Distribution as a Function of Spatial Scale for Detection of Masses in Mammograms

1. Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., and Day, N.E.: Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results of screening. Lancet 339 (1992) 412–414

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Bird, R. E., Wallace, T.W., and Yankaskas, B.C.: Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184 (1992) 613–617

   Google Scholar 

3. van Dijck, J. A. M., Verbeek, L. M., Hendriks, J. H. C. L., and Holland, R.: The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. Cancer 72 (1993) 1933–1938

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Harvey, J. E., Fajardo, L. L., and Inis, C. A.: Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. AJR 161 (1993) 1167–1172

   Google Scholar 

5. Roehrig, J., Doi, T., Hasegawa, A., Hunt, B., Marshall, J., Romsdahl, H., Schneider, A., Sharbaugh, R., and Zang, W.: Clinical results with r2 imagechecker in support of fda pma application. In N Karssemeijer, MAO Thijssen, JHCL Hendriks, and LJTO van Erning, editors, Digital Mammography, Kluwer, Dordrecht, (1998) 395–400

   Google Scholar 

6. Vitak, B.: Invasive interval cancers in the Östergötland mammographic screening programme: Radiological analysis. European Radiology 8 (1998) 639–646

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Thurfjell, E. L., Lernevall, K. A., and Taube, A. A. S.: Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 191 (1994) 241–244

   Google Scholar 

8. Chan, H. P., Doi, K., Vyborny, C. J., Schmidt, R. A., Metz, C. E., Lam, K. L., Ogura, T., Wu, T., and Macmahon, H.: Improvement in radiologist’s detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Inv Radiol 25 (1990) 1102–1110

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Astley, S., Hutt, I., Adamson, S., Rose, P., Miller, P., Boggis, C., Taylor, C., Valentine, T., and Davies, J.: Automation in mammography: computer vision and human perception. SPIE 1905 (1993) 716–730

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Kegelmeyer, W. P., Pruneda, J. M., Bourland, P. D., Hillis, A., Riggs, M.W., and Nipper, M. L.: Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 191 (1994) 331–337

    Google Scholar 

11. Dean, P. B.: Overview of breast cancer screening. In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996) 19–26

    Google Scholar 

12. Lau, T. K., and Bischof, W. F.: Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. Comp and Biomed Research 24 (1991) 273–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Yin, F F., Giger, M. L., Doi, K., Metz, C. E., Vyborny, C. J., and Schmidt, R. A.: Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: Analysis of bilateral substraction images. Med Phys 18 (1991) 955–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Miller, P., and Astley, S. M.: Automated detection of mammographic asymmetry using anatomical features. Int. Journal of Pattern Recognition and AI 7 (1992) 1461–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Karssemeijer, N., and te Brake, G. M.: Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imag 15 (1996) 611–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Miller, L., and Ramsey, N.: The detection of malignant masses by non-linear multiscale analysis. In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996) 335–340

    Google Scholar 

17. Petrick, N., Chan, H. P., Sahiner, B., and Wei, D.: An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection. IEEE Trans Med Imag 15 (1996) 59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Vujovic, N., and Brzakovic, D.: Establishing the correspondence between control points in pairs of mammographic images. IEEE Trans Imag Processing 6 (1997) 1388–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. te Brake, G. M., and Karssemeijer, N.: Detection of stellate breast abnormalities. In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam, (1996) 341–346

    Google Scholar 

20. Karssemeijer, N.: Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms using scale space operators. In Y Bizais, C Barrilot, and R Di Paola, editors, Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995) 335–346

    Google Scholar 

21. Laine, A. F., Schuler, S., Fan, J., and Huda, W.: Mammographic feature enhancement by multiscale enhancement. IEEE Trans on Med Imag 13 (1994) 725–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Laine, A., Huda, W., Chen, D. W., and Harris, J.: Segmentation of masses using continuous scale representations. In K Doi, M L Giger, R M Nishikawa, and R A Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996) 447–450

    Google Scholar 

23. Wei, D., Chan, H. P., Helvie, M. A., Sahiner, B., Petrick, N., Adler, D. D., and Goodsitt, M. M.: Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. Med Phys 22 (1995) 1501–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Karssemeijer, N., and te Brake, G.M.: Combining single view features and asymmetry for detection of mass lesions. In N Karssemeijer, MAO Thijssen, JHCL Hendriks, and LJTO van Erning, editors, Digital Mammography, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998) 95–102

    Google Scholar 

25. Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D. R., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C. R. M., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S L., Taylor, P., Betal, D., and Savage, J.: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In A G Gale, S M Astley, D R Dance, and A Y Cairns, editors, Digital Mammography, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994) 375–378

    Google Scholar 

Download references