Timeline for Make your language unusable
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2017 at 1:29 | comment | added | sergiol | Before seeing you answer, I was trying to answer in Tcl and I followed the same reasoning line of your first approach! | |
| S Jan 21, 2016 at 17:16 | history | suggested | wizzwizz4 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed a typo and was a pedant.
|
| Jan 21, 2016 at 16:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 21, 2016 at 17:16 | |||||
| Oct 20, 2015 at 7:32 | comment | added | jimmy23013 | Of course you don't need to rename them. But this is not code-golf. I just thought renaming them may (or may not) make this answer looks better. | |
| Oct 20, 2015 at 7:28 | comment | added | slebetman |
I decided not to rename if because being able to do if alone is pretty much useless if you want to generate output.
|
|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 7:27 | comment | added | slebetman |
@jimmy23013: OK. Code now works without needing to call rename. It was brainfart on my part - I forgot to exclude proc.
|
|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 7:26 | history | edited | slebetman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 31 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 7:24 | comment | added | slebetman |
@jimmy23013 Hmm.. technically you should be right but that code snippet works with the current version of tcl even when proc appears in the list before puts. Technically the code should also work without rename but built-in commands seem to be protected otherwise. Not sure what's going on but the code is tested and works as advertised.
|
|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 7:08 | comment | added | jimmy23013 |
I think you can make it better by renaming if and rename after the loop. In the second version, you should also make proc an exception.
|
|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 5:36 | history | edited | slebetman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 580 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 5:08 | history | answered | slebetman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |