Timeline for 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
154 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 23, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
S Apr 23, 2016 at 0:25 | history | notice added | Alex A. | Historical significance | |
S Apr 23, 2016 at 0:25 | history | locked | Alex A. | ||
Apr 23, 2016 at 0:25 | history | closed | Alex A. | Needs more focus | |
Apr 23, 2016 at 0:04 | history | rollback | Alex A. |
Rollback to Revision 7
|
|
Apr 22, 2016 at 23:53 | history | edited | cat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I'll edit this way more thoroughly later
|
Apr 22, 2016 at 20:05 | answer | added | Gust van de Wal | timeline score: 1 | |
Sep 9, 2014 at 9:01 | answer | added | overactor | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 21, 2014 at 23:39 | answer | added | 1j01 | timeline score: 1 | |
S Mar 28, 2014 at 18:40 | history | bounty ended | Radiodef | ||
S Mar 28, 2014 at 18:40 | history | notice removed | Radiodef | ||
Mar 27, 2014 at 16:42 | comment | added | CSᵠ |
PHP (80chr) $i=2;while($i){$i=$i%9==6?4:$i<<1;if($i%9==7)echo $i-1,$i,2+$i+=5;else echo $i;} can't post answer???
|
|
S Mar 27, 2014 at 3:04 | history | bounty started | Radiodef | ||
S Mar 27, 2014 at 3:04 | history | notice added | Radiodef | Reward existing answer | |
Mar 27, 2014 at 3:02 | vote | accept | Radiodef | ||
Mar 24, 2014 at 11:05 | answer | added | Vishwanath gowda k | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 24, 2014 at 10:46 | answer | added | Aleksi Torhamo | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 22, 2014 at 16:48 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
Mar 22, 2014 at 16:17 | history | edited | null | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
RFC 2119
|
Mar 22, 2014 at 11:12 | answer | added | n̴̖̋h̷͉̃a̷̭̿h̸̡̅ẗ̵̨́d̷̰̀ĥ̷̳ | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 21, 2014 at 13:36 | answer | added | Fingashpitzzz | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 21, 2014 at 4:20 | answer | added | GregRos | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 20, 2014 at 22:55 | answer | added | damix911 | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 20, 2014 at 17:43 | answer | added | Orion | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 20, 2014 at 13:12 | answer | added | Bill Woodger | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 18:45 | answer | added | Leandro Poblet | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 18:26 | answer | added | Paddy3118 | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 18:21 | answer | added | Puru-- | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 17:11 | answer | added | Andy Burton | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 13:22 | answer | added | BenVlodgi | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 13:05 | answer | added | Matthew Moss | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 10:42 | answer | added | alexandercannon | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 10:00 | answer | added | Danek | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 19, 2014 at 8:11 | answer | added | Alma Do | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 22:10 | answer | added | Jay | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 16:31 | comment | added | Radiodef | @ThorbjørnRavnAndersen The numbers appear in the television show Lost. There is actually not really a whole lot more to it than that. They are a plot device and part of the lore. | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 15:41 | answer | added | sam hocevar | timeline score: 19 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 14:56 | answer | added | Wlerin | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 8:03 | answer | added | mmachenry | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 6:38 | answer | added | ErikE | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 18, 2014 at 0:38 | answer | added | Easton | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 17, 2014 at 19:43 | answer | added | Anant | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 17, 2014 at 16:37 | answer | added | DavidC | timeline score: 20 | |
Mar 17, 2014 at 12:01 | comment | added | Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen | Out of curiosity - what is the background for this particular sequence? | |
Mar 17, 2014 at 3:11 | answer | added | aperson | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 19:56 | answer | added | C5H8NNaO4 | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 18:00 | answer | added | irufushi | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 8:31 | answer | added | Florian F | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 6:05 | answer | added | wuiyang | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 3:53 | answer | added | max.haredoom | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 2:58 | answer | added | hacatu | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 0:50 | answer | added | user19214 | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 0:31 | answer | added | BlueCacti | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 16, 2014 at 0:14 | answer | added | Henry F | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 23:54 | answer | added | Christopher King | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 23:22 | answer | added | agrif | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 22:07 | answer | added | ion | timeline score: 9 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 19:05 | answer | added | Riot | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 18:38 | answer | added | histocrat | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 17:27 | answer | added | ajax16384 | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 12:34 | comment | added | George Reith | @squeamishossifrage Haven't watched lost, understand binary. Uh oh! | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 12:28 | answer | added | TecBrat | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 10:27 | answer | added | zxc | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 9:34 | answer | added | CompuChip | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 15, 2014 at 1:00 | answer | added | Lodewijk | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 18:27 | comment | added | Radiodef | @kojiro I left it open to interpretation so I suppose that would be a valid entry. "Outputs infinitely" implies you have infinite time to output them. But it would be difficult to demonstrate it works and unfiltered output wouldn't be obvious on its own. | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 12:14 | comment | added | Spook | const int four = 1+1+1+1; | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 11:28 | answer | added | zakk | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 10:23 | answer | added | ahy1 | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 10:20 | answer | added | michal.hubczyk | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 8:53 | answer | added | Jussi M | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 8:41 | answer | added | alyx-brett | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 7:18 | answer | added | Ruben | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 14, 2014 at 4:25 | answer | added | V-SHY | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 22:53 | answer | added | sh54 | timeline score: 24 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 22:18 | answer | added | TheConstructor | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 21:48 | answer | added | X123M3-256 | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 18:53 | answer | added | Oberon | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 17:59 | answer | added | xem | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 17:43 | answer | added | ɐɔıʇǝɥʇuʎs | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 14:57 | answer | added | Pruthvi Raj | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 14:46 | answer | added | Hinek | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 14:00 | answer | added | Dmitry | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 13:53 | answer | added | durron597 | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 13:45 | answer | added | sebcap26 | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 13:21 | comment | added | kojiro | I notice the question does not prohibit outputting other numbers. So at least according to infinite-monkey-theory an unadulterated pseudo-random number generator should do the trick. | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 12:07 | answer | added | Teun Pronk | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 11:25 | answer | added | Rik | timeline score: 29 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 10:51 | answer | added | luxcem | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 9:30 | answer | added | Martin Thoma | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 9:21 | answer | added | Oded | timeline score: 8 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 9:19 | comment | added | user1853181 | Thou shall not count to two, unless they proceed to three! :) | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 8:42 | answer | added | TheOneWhoPrograms | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 4:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeGolf/status/443970596167503872 | ||
Mar 13, 2014 at 1:54 | answer | added | Andrew Soutar | timeline score: 7 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 1:12 | answer | added | user15244 | timeline score: 47 | |
Mar 13, 2014 at 0:24 | answer | added | ninjalj | timeline score: 5 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 23:03 | answer | added | asr | timeline score: 13 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 23:02 | answer | added | grovesNL | timeline score: 11 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 22:58 | answer | added | Dave Forber | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 22:04 | answer | added | user1502040 | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 22:03 | answer | added | Alex | timeline score: 0 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 21:47 | answer | added | CCP | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 21:38 | answer | added | bodo | timeline score: 12 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 21:31 | answer | added | Heinzi | timeline score: 14 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 21:21 | answer | added | Radiodef | timeline score: 232 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:38 | answer | added | Brad | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:34 | answer | added | Sebastian Negraszus | timeline score: 44 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:27 | answer | added | Timtech | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:18 | answer | added | r3mainer | timeline score: 22 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 19:53 | comment | added | Ypnypn |
Some formulas are available at OEIS. a(i)=a(i-1)+a(i-3)+a(i-5) seems like it could help.
|
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 19:37 | answer | added | Michael M. | timeline score: 54 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 19:12 | answer | added | Stephen Melvin | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 19:08 | answer | added | CompuChip | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 18:24 | answer | added | Jussi M | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 18:19 | comment | added | Geobits | You just didn't look far enough. It's around 8.45e9 ;) | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 18:16 | comment | added | Radiodef | @Geobits I didn't see you had actually already done it until after the edit but you got an up vote from me since it was a thing I had in mind. : ) I tried to find a seed myself but wasn't able to. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 18:13 | comment | added | Geobits | When I saw the edit that added a link to "fix a pseudo-random generator", I thought it would point to my answer below. Instead it links to a page on SO :( | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 18:10 | answer | added | Kevin | timeline score: 183 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 18:01 | comment | added | CompuChip | @Radiodef aha I see what you did there... haven't seen Lost in quite some time! | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:55 | comment | added | Radiodef | @Vereos I get what you meant, I am just saying I still don't understand where the down votes came from. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:51 | history | edited | Radiodef | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 523 characters in body
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:48 | comment | added | Vereos | @Radiodef The point of my sentence was not that; I just wanted to enhance the fact that in my opinion a downvote should always be paired to a (more or less) kind comment. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:31 | comment | added | Radiodef | @manatwork That's a good point, I forgot about underscores. Not sure if I should edit the OP. I thought about loopholes like this but ultimately figured that answers that take advantage of loopholes would be unpopular so it didn't make much of a difference. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:29 | comment | added | Radiodef | @Vereos 'Pretty trivial to solve' isn't even particularly constructive considering that many popularity contests are trivial to solve and the point is not to do the bare minimum. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:26 | answer | added | Oriol | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:57 | comment | added | Vereos |
@PeterTaylor For sure, but newcomers mostly will not get that and leave the site instead of trying to improve their future questions. I guess that This isn't an interesting question, IMHO, since the solution is pretty trivial. Please post in the sandbox next time. would be way better than This is a stupid question. , but that's just my personal opinion.
|
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:41 | answer | added | Mukul Kumar | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:37 | answer | added | gilbertohasnofb | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:31 | answer | added | jerry | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:26 | comment | added | r3mainer | There are 11 types of people in this world: those that watched Lost, those that didn't, and those that don't understand binary. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:09 | answer | added | user80551 | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 15:59 | answer | added | orion | timeline score: 10 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 15:54 | answer | added | daniero | timeline score: 10 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 15:50 | answer | added | rdurand | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 15:26 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | @Vereos, "This is a stupid question" isn't very constructive, which might be why no-one posted it as a comment. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 15:01 | answer | added | null | timeline score: 77 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 14:30 | comment | added | V-X | This might have been funny as code-golf... | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 14:01 | comment | added | Jonathan Van Matre | "Should I post these suggestions?" If you are changing the rules of the contest, no. If you just want to provide some ideas to get people to try approaching the challenge differently, go for it! Also, bear in mind there are no bonuses in a popularity contest...the votes reign supreme. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 13:59 | comment | added | daniero | @Vereos I was just thinking the same thing (... and 8 answers). I don't think the question is great, but I gave an upvote (and a comment) to even it out a bit. | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 13:57 | comment | added | manatwork |
“You may not use the numeral 1 followed by the numeral 5” – So “1_5” is valid? Because ruby and perl just interprets it as 15.
|
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 13:52 | comment | added | Vereos | I can count 6 downvotes but no comments :/ | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 13:40 | answer | added | Geobits | timeline score: 18 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 13:09 | answer | added | Jordon Biondo | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 6:44 | answer | added | John Dvorak | timeline score: 19 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 6:32 | answer | added | DocMax | timeline score: 11 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 6:23 | answer | added | Tony Ellis | timeline score: 25 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 5:46 | history | edited | Radiodef | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 94 characters in body
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 5:37 | history | edited | Radiodef | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 272 characters in body
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 5:37 | answer | added | Ol' Reliable | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 12, 2014 at 5:24 | history | edited | Radiodef | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"Your job" is wrong since I did it too.
|
Mar 12, 2014 at 5:15 | history | edited | Radiodef | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
S Mar 12, 2014 at 4:58 | answer | added | Radiodef | timeline score: 3 | |
S Mar 12, 2014 at 4:58 | history | asked | Radiodef | CC BY-SA 3.0 |