Timeline for Find your dog's age
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
41 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15 at 22:00 | answer | added | Kai Burghardt | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 7, 2021 at 11:46 | answer | added | Wasif | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 3, 2021 at 11:07 | vote | accept | Razetime | ||
| Apr 19, 2021 at 21:01 | answer | added | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 19, 2021 at 21:01 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Apr 19, 2021 at 20:25 | answer | added | Makonede | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 12, 2020 at 6:16 | answer | added | roblogic | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 12, 2020 at 4:36 | comment | added | roblogic |
This question misinterprets the formula. n and d are the wrong way around. From the source paper: (equivalent) human_age = 16 ln(dog_age) + 31
|
|
| Dec 12, 2020 at 0:10 | comment | added | roblogic |
Many solutions seem to have the logic backwards, giving answers d much less than n. Unless I missed something
|
|
| Aug 6, 2020 at 5:24 | answer | added | TehPers | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 8:32 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 0:42 | answer | added | user96495 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 3, 2020 at 4:54 | vote | accept | Razetime | ||
| May 3, 2021 at 11:07 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2020 at 19:36 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 18:24 | history | edited | caird coinheringaahin g♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 17:01 | history | edited | Jonathan Allan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 83 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 16:44 | answer | added | Mukundan314 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 16:34 | comment | added | Razetime | Yes. Definitely. | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 16:33 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan |
Are we allowed to assume n is an integer?
|
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 16:10 | answer | added | LambdaBeta | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 15:55 | answer | added | duckmayr | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 15:14 | answer | added | Jonathan Allan | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 15:03 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan |
...also I imagine trailing zeros may be implicit, right? (i.e. that 0.5 is an acceptable output when given an input of 20 [rather than 0.50])
|
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 14:59 | history | edited | Razetime | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added decimal places
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 14:59 | comment | added | Razetime | It means two decimal places. I'll specify that. | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 14:58 | answer | added | PkmnQ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 14:36 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan | Does "rounded to 2 digits" mean two decimal places or two significant figures? (I don't think this adds anything to the challenge either way.) | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 14:15 | answer | added | Noodle9 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 13:47 | answer | added | Graham | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 13:23 | answer | added | user96495 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 13:06 | comment | added | Razetime | Ok, I set the max age to 122, which keeps the maximum age to 295.15. Thanks! | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 13:04 | history | edited | Razetime | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changed cutoff age
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 13:02 | answer | added | Kjetil S | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 13:00 | comment | added | the default. |
At 969 years, floating point imprecision becomes significant (the correct answer is 28874468684703116351749853 point something, while a simple calculation with doubles returns 28874468684703116489129984.00. Are you sure you want to set the upper limit to such a high value?
|
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 12:51 | history | edited | Razetime | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
boldened rule, added input constraints
|
| Aug 2, 2020 at 12:51 | comment | added | Razetime | Yes, it's a firm rule. | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 12:37 | comment | added | Dingus | Is 'rounded to 2 digits' a firm rule? Neither of the current answers do this. | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 12:36 | answer | added | Noodle9 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 12:34 | answer | added | nph | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 12:28 | comment | added | Arnauld | Which range of human years are we supposed to support accurately? | |
| Aug 2, 2020 at 11:46 | history | asked | Razetime | CC BY-SA 4.0 |