Timeline for Roman Numeral Counting
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2022 at 19:33 | vote | accept | tuskiomi | ||
| Nov 4, 2019 at 13:15 | answer | added | Kevin Cruijssen | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 23:16 | answer | added | Nick Kennedy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 20:09 | comment | added | trillian | How exactly does an L intersect the bottom line twice? | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 17:35 | answer | added | punkkapoika | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 16:15 | answer | added | Nick Kennedy | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 2, 2019 at 21:57 | history | edited | Arnauld |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 2, 2019 at 13:03 | comment | added | Kjetil S |
I think the last two answers should be 2,2 => II X CI CC CD DI DC and 3,3 => III IX XI LV XC CII CX CCI CCC CDI DII DX DCI DCC as IC and ID are not a valid roman numbers but CDI=401 is. Otherwise, this was a great puzzle.
|
|
| Nov 2, 2019 at 12:53 | answer | added | Kjetil S | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 2, 2019 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/1190508976066027520 | ||
| Nov 2, 2019 at 3:17 | comment | added | HiddenBabel | projecteuler.net/about=roman_numerals | |
| Nov 2, 2019 at 3:04 | comment | added | JBernardo |
IC, ID are not valid roman numerals.
|
|
| Nov 2, 2019 at 1:12 | answer | added | Neil | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 2, 2019 at 0:03 | comment | added | tuskiomi | @Neil My Bad. I've fixed it | |
| Nov 2, 2019 at 0:02 | history | edited | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 27 characters in body
|
| Nov 1, 2019 at 23:58 | comment | added | Neil |
Because 45 is written as XLV instead.
|
|
| Nov 1, 2019 at 23:56 | comment | added | Neil |
The last test case appears to be missing DCC. I wouldn't mind answering this question if it stuck to standard Roman numerals, where e.g. the last test case would only be III IX XI LV XC CII CX CCI CCC CDI DII DX DCI DCC.
|
|
| Nov 1, 2019 at 23:45 | comment | added | Jonah | Well written but upvoted mainly for sheer oddness of the challenge. | |
| Nov 1, 2019 at 21:00 | comment | added | Poke | +1 Looks interesting | |
| Nov 1, 2019 at 20:54 | comment | added | Jonathan Allan | Would you be able to add the counting rules? | |
| Nov 1, 2019 at 19:40 | history | asked | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |