Timeline for breadboard challenges?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
29 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2021 at 22:25 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod |
edited tags
|
|
| May 18, 2017 at 17:48 | comment | added | tuskiomi | @programmer5000 see the linked meta question. This is programming. codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10893/… | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 26, 2016 at 9:25 | answer | added | isaacg | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 21, 2016 at 3:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeGolf/status/811410302009016320 | ||
| Dec 16, 2016 at 18:48 | answer | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 16, 2016 at 18:28 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | You say "this seems to be received well", even though there are not currently any positively voted answers. Note that upvotes on the question generally mean "this needs discussing" rather than "I am in favour of this". | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 20:42 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @ChristopherPeart That's not a duplicate, since using a breadboard is programming. Typically, it's hardware programming, but there are also online simulators, as linked above. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:59 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 15, 2016 at 22:30 | |||||
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:40 | history | edited | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:38 | comment | added | user63187 | Possible duplicate of Where to put non coding challenges? | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:25 | answer | added | user63187 | timeline score: -5 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 19:41 | history | edited | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Dec 14, 2016 at 19:26 | history | edited | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 149 characters in body
|
| Dec 14, 2016 at 18:57 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @tuskiomi Agreed. This isn't [code-golf], it's a "programming puzzle" (see the site's title). | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 6:59 | comment | added | tuskiomi | @ATaco i agree, however, this is not a challenge for puzzling, either. I would like to raise the possibility of letting participants use programmable chips, such as the ATMega series, or ARM Processors. | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 6:56 | history | edited | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 500 characters in body
|
| Dec 14, 2016 at 4:07 | comment | added | ATaco | I'm against this. This site is for Programming Challenges, although this relates to electronics, it itself is not programming. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:35 | comment | added | tuskiomi | @ais523 I'll put a proposal in my question in a few. Thanks for the critique! | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 13:50 | comment | added | user62131 | I think you need some rules on how far you can stretch the pins. With a resistor or low-power diode, you can get quite a distance (or alternatively place the pins right next to each other by standing it on end), but some components (e.g. ICs) aren't as accommodating with their pin arrangements. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 4:58 | history | edited | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 262 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 4:55 | comment | added | tuskiomi | @wyldstallyns Thank you! | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 4:52 | history | edited | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 262 characters in body
|
| Dec 13, 2016 at 2:44 | comment | added | wyldstallyns | circuits.io, specifically circuits.io/lab | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 1:18 | comment | added | Gabriel Benamy | I have no idea what I'm looking at | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 1:01 | comment | added | feersum | A remark like "ideally no noise" certainly doesn't belong in a golf specification. In general, you need an objective way to decide if the answer is valid. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 0:38 | history | asked | tuskiomi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |