Skip to main content
+a couple notes on modern scholarship, and links
Source Link
Nathaniel is protesting
  • 42.5k
  • 12
  • 134
  • 321

It sounds like you are looking forWith respect to the traditional attributions, so here arehere's the other biblical works that each is traditionally thought to have writtensimple list:

If you're interestedModern scholarship, which typically rejects the traditionally attributed authors of these books, still generally attributes Luke and Acts to the same author. There is less agreement on the authorship of the other books attributed to John, however.

Finally, there are some apocryphal workssome apocryphal works that are attributed to these authors, but they are not part of the canon:

It sounds like you are looking for traditional attributions, so here are the other biblical works that each is traditionally thought to have written:

  • Matthew: None
  • Mark: None
  • Luke: Acts
  • John: 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, and Revelation

If you're interested, there are some apocryphal works that are attributed to these authors, but they are not part of the canon:

With respect to the traditional attributions, here's the simple list:

Modern scholarship, which typically rejects the traditionally attributed authors of these books, still generally attributes Luke and Acts to the same author. There is less agreement on the authorship of the other books attributed to John, however.

Finally, there are some apocryphal works that are attributed to these authors, but they are not part of the canon:

+apocryphal
Source Link
Nathaniel is protesting
  • 42.5k
  • 12
  • 134
  • 321

It sounds like you are looking for traditional attributions, so here are the other biblical works that each is traditionally thought to have written:

  • Matthew: None
  • Mark: None
  • Luke: Acts
  • John: 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, and Revelation

If you're interested, there are some apocryphal works that are attributed to these authors, but they are not part of the canon:

It sounds like you are looking for traditional attributions, so here are the other biblical works that each is traditionally thought to have written:

  • Matthew: None
  • Mark: None
  • Luke: Acts
  • John: 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, and Revelation

It sounds like you are looking for traditional attributions, so here are the other biblical works that each is traditionally thought to have written:

  • Matthew: None
  • Mark: None
  • Luke: Acts
  • John: 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, and Revelation

If you're interested, there are some apocryphal works that are attributed to these authors, but they are not part of the canon:

Source Link
Nathaniel is protesting
  • 42.5k
  • 12
  • 134
  • 321

It sounds like you are looking for traditional attributions, so here are the other biblical works that each is traditionally thought to have written:

  • Matthew: None
  • Mark: None
  • Luke: Acts
  • John: 1 John, 2 John, 3 John, and Revelation