Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This bit however--the water is drawn out from a less concentrated environment... to a more concentrated out--first off, you probably mean "one" there but, second, you have this backwards, right? or you're talking about the water being drawn to something with a more concentrated amount of sth-other-than-water? $\endgroup$
    – lly
    Commented Jul 20, 2018 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ @lly Thanks! Though I did take enough care to pick the right sources/references, there is of course always a possibility that I may have erred somewhere. And yes, I had a feeling someone or the other would raise the "concentration" problem :P $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 20, 2018 at 16:26
  • $\begingroup$ @lly I've edited the answer to address that last issue. I hope that works O:) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 20, 2018 at 16:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Shouldn't we be asking: Why have we evolved a sensitivity to the smell of rotting fish? If seagulls can smell it they certainly don't mind it. $\endgroup$
    – D Duck
    Commented Jul 21, 2018 at 21:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DDuck As far as I understand it, us evolving an aversion to the smell of rotten anything (not just fish) is Nature's way of telling us that some of the by-products of microbe induced decomposition of most foodstuff isn't meant to find its way into our mouths (much less our stomachs). Seagulls, vultures, flies, etc have mechanisms within them that nullify/greatly diminish detrimental effects of consuming such food (that would otherwise be seen in humans) ;-) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 22, 2018 at 13:59