Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 7, 2022 at 23:58 comment added uhoh Totally unrelated except for "explode" and "water": A basic understanding of the Navier-Stokes, or Terry Tao's "exploding water" problem
Mar 27, 2018 at 11:15 comment added Eashaan Godbole This is also a good watch: youtube.com/watch?v=_f0vK8Wffgg
Mar 27, 2018 at 8:16 comment added Klaws The "other answer" would be...evolution. A species with a high enough concentration of acid in its body to explode when water is added would not survive. As mankind is not yet extinct[citation needed], we can assume that evolution has dealt with this and obviously found a way to mitigate this issue. Unfortunately, this answer belongs into Biology, not Chemistry.
Mar 26, 2018 at 21:38 comment added Karl @RamKeswani I'm sorry, it is a shame how lousy textbooks (and teachers!) are especially in developing countries. You should never accept anything written in a book or said by a teacher if it is not satisfactorily, logically explained why and under what circumstances it is the case.
Mar 26, 2018 at 20:19 comment added zwol @RamKeswani That sounds like safety advice for doing experiments. Safety advice is often much more cautious than is technically necessary.
Mar 26, 2018 at 19:33 comment added Oscar Lanzi Yikes! That YouTube video is bad! Not proper prtoection (exposed skin)! No fume hood! Please do not try it this way at home!
Mar 26, 2018 at 17:27 answer added user7951 timeline score: 24
Mar 26, 2018 at 16:57 review Close votes
Mar 26, 2018 at 18:41
Mar 26, 2018 at 10:23 comment added M.A.R. @Dmitry it doesn't seem to be. It seems like this one is building up on that one.
Mar 26, 2018 at 9:55 comment added Ram Keswani @Karl I study in India. The science book of mine (and of 70% other students in my age group) read, "You should add acid to water and not vice versa, because it results in an exothermic reaction and the contents of the beaker might splash out. The beaker might break." Only this much. Though not exact but nothing more. I am 15, and in class 10th.
Mar 26, 2018 at 8:28 review Close votes
Mar 26, 2018 at 12:20
Mar 26, 2018 at 8:08 comment added Dmitry Grigoryev Possible duplicate of Why first water and then acid?
Mar 26, 2018 at 3:24 comment added user545424 There is an interesting video on YouTube exploring why it is recommended to add acid to water instead of vice versa: youtube.com/watch?v=fMYju7hMdqA.
Mar 25, 2018 at 19:35 comment added Oscar Lanzi Right @Ian. I have experience with hydrochloric acid at work, for that one the big issue is fuming. I have found that if I add acid to enough water to drop the acid concentration to about 10%, then I can safely make up additional volume adding water. But upon water-rinsing the cylinder that contained 37% stock solution I see fumes from the traces of that acid.
Mar 25, 2018 at 18:32 comment added Ian The point of the acid to water rule is to spread the acid around: a given mass of a given type of acid will make a certain amount of heat, and by having all the water already there, you give plenty of heat capacity to spread this heat around. But if there's not too much acid in the first place, then it doesn't matter.
S Mar 25, 2018 at 15:10 history suggested user60221 CC BY-SA 3.0
Grammar, spelling
Mar 25, 2018 at 13:52 vote accept Ram Keswani
Mar 25, 2018 at 11:40 history tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/977872757194141696
Mar 25, 2018 at 10:18 comment added Alchimista It is surely better to dilute acid by adding water and not viceversa. But it is not that all acids are H2SO4, as far "explosion" is of concern. Plus see answer
Mar 25, 2018 at 9:49 answer added Oscar Lanzi timeline score: 77
Mar 25, 2018 at 9:39 review Suggested edits
S Mar 25, 2018 at 15:10
Mar 25, 2018 at 9:09 history asked Ram Keswani CC BY-SA 3.0