Timeline for What reaction occurs when etching copper to create circuit boards?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2019 at 19:20 | comment | added | SasQ | I guess "++" was a good notation until the number of pluses required got larger ;) | |
| Jul 24, 2018 at 5:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jul 24, 2018 at 8:34 | |||||
| Jul 22, 2018 at 4:30 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jul 22, 2018 at 5:51 | |||||
| Nov 12, 2015 at 16:50 | comment | added | MaxW | @Jan - LOL Pauling "The Nature of the Chemical Bond" used the $\ce{Cu^{++}}$ notation so your odd biology teacher was in good company.... | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 16:35 | comment | added | Jan | Will, I'm not aware of any conventions, but I only ever saw $\ce{Cu^2+}$ (or $\ce{Cu++}$ from a particularly old biology teacher) so I thought I'ld better ask before doing things wrong ;) | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 16:34 | history | edited | Jan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed extraneous bracket, fixed the look of HOAc while at it.
|
| Nov 12, 2015 at 16:23 | comment | added | MaxW | Changed it. Didn't realize that there was such a strong convention, or that anyone would care... | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 16:22 | history | edited | MaxW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 12, 2015 at 9:23 | comment | added | Jan | Before I edit it away amoung another minor typo I found, is there a reason why you write $\ce{Cu+^2}$ rather than $\ce{Cu^2+}$? | |
| Nov 12, 2015 at 1:18 | history | answered | MaxW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |