Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • $\begingroup$ Before I edit it away amoung another minor typo I found, is there a reason why you write $\ce{Cu+^2}$ rather than $\ce{Cu^2+}$? $\endgroup$
    – Jan
    Commented Nov 12, 2015 at 9:23
  • $\begingroup$ Changed it. Didn't realize that there was such a strong convention, or that anyone would care... $\endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Commented Nov 12, 2015 at 16:23
  • $\begingroup$ Will, I'm not aware of any conventions, but I only ever saw $\ce{Cu^2+}$ (or $\ce{Cu++}$ from a particularly old biology teacher) so I thought I'ld better ask before doing things wrong ;) $\endgroup$
    – Jan
    Commented Nov 12, 2015 at 16:35
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Jan - LOL Pauling "The Nature of the Chemical Bond" used the $\ce{Cu^{++}}$ notation so your odd biology teacher was in good company.... $\endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Commented Nov 12, 2015 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ I guess "++" was a good notation until the number of pluses required got larger ;) $\endgroup$
    – SasQ
    Commented Nov 20, 2019 at 19:20