Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the wonderful answer. Could you please elaborate on why this isn't required in the case of cathode rays? I couldn't understand that quite well. $\endgroup$
    – entropy
    Commented May 14 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ @entropy Cathode rays are the result of discharging electrons on gas molecules (thus, i) light is seen already between anode and cathode, ii) there can be multiple/different sorts of charged molecules generated). Anode rays are the result of electron impact on the surface of a solid target (hence reference to the conventional X-ray tube, though I presume today it equally could be a liquid (microfocus / molten metal jet X-ray tube), too). $\endgroup$
    – Buttonwood
    Commented May 15 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ Right, thanks a lot. Makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for the time and effort. $\endgroup$
    – entropy
    Commented May 15 at 17:43