Skip to main content
Post Locked by Buck Thorn
Notice added Content dispute by Buck Thorn
Notice removed Content dispute by Buck Thorn
Post Unlocked by Buck Thorn
Post Locked by Buck Thorn
Notice added Content dispute by Buck Thorn
Expanded.
Source Link

Compounds with fluorescence and/or phosphorescence, what can do both?

What else (besides benzophenone) can both do phosphorescence but not fluorescence, and what else can do both phosphorescence and fluorescence? For example, does pentacene can do both?

I'm reading that there are more compounds that can only do 1, than do both. But is there any inherent contradiction that if it had the properties, the properties will contradict?

For example, if a compound has properties A and B to do fluorescence, and properties C and D to do phosphorescence, then a compound that has A, B, C, and D, should do both fluorescence and phosphorescence, and will not have any contraindicating properties?

And what do we have for fluorescence/phosphorescence in the visible-light range, i.e., absorb violet and emit red.

So far I only have organic compounds examples, what about for inorganic compounds examples? As well as for organometallics.

Compounds with fluorescence and/or phosphorescence

What else (besides benzophenone) can both do phosphorescence but not fluorescence, and what else can do both phosphorescence and fluorescence? For example, does pentacene can do both?

I'm reading that there are more compounds that can only do 1, than do both. But is there any inherent contradiction that if it had the properties, the properties will contradict?

For example, if a compound has properties A and B to do fluorescence, and properties C and D to do phosphorescence, then a compound that has A, B, C, and D, should do both fluorescence and phosphorescence, and will not have any contraindicating properties?

And what do we have for fluorescence/phosphorescence in the visible-light range, i.e., absorb violet and emit red.

So far I only have organic compounds, what about for inorganic compounds?

Compounds with fluorescence and/or phosphorescence, what can do both?

What else (besides benzophenone) can both do phosphorescence but not fluorescence, and what else can do both phosphorescence and fluorescence? For example, does pentacene can do both?

I'm reading that there are more compounds that can only do 1, than do both. But is there any inherent contradiction that if it had the properties, the properties will contradict?

For example, if a compound has properties A and B to do fluorescence, and properties C and D to do phosphorescence, then a compound that has A, B, C, and D, should do both fluorescence and phosphorescence, and will not have any contraindicating properties?

And what do we have for fluorescence/phosphorescence in the visible-light range, i.e., absorb violet and emit red.

So far I only have organic compounds examples, what about for inorganic compounds examples? As well as for organometallics.

Added pentacene. Note that benzophenone and pentacene were examples from other sites.
Added to review
Source Link

What else (besides benzophenone) can both do phosphorescence but not fluorescence, and what else can do both phosphorescence and fluorescence? For example, does pentacene can do both?

I'm reading that there are more compounds that can only do 1, than do both. But is there any inherent contradiction that if it had the properties, the properties will contradict?

For example, if a compound has properties A and B to do fluorescence, and properties C and D to do phosphorescence, then a compound that has A, B, C, and D, should do both fluorescence and phosphorescence, and will not have any contraindicating properties?

And what do we have for fluorescence/phosphorescence in the visible-light range, i.e., absorb violet and emit red.

So far I only have organic compounds, what about for inorganic compounds?

What else (besides benzophenone) can both do phosphorescence but not fluorescence, and what else can do both phosphorescence and fluorescence?

I'm reading that there are more compounds that can only do 1, than do both. But is there any inherent contradiction that if it had the properties, the properties will contradict?

For example, if a compound has properties A and B to do fluorescence, and properties C and D to do phosphorescence, then a compound that has A, B, C, and D, should do both fluorescence and phosphorescence, and will not have any contraindicating properties?

And what do we have for fluorescence/phosphorescence in the visible-light range, i.e., absorb violet and emit red.

So far I only have organic compounds, what about for inorganic compounds?

What else (besides benzophenone) can both do phosphorescence but not fluorescence, and what else can do both phosphorescence and fluorescence? For example, does pentacene can do both?

I'm reading that there are more compounds that can only do 1, than do both. But is there any inherent contradiction that if it had the properties, the properties will contradict?

For example, if a compound has properties A and B to do fluorescence, and properties C and D to do phosphorescence, then a compound that has A, B, C, and D, should do both fluorescence and phosphorescence, and will not have any contraindicating properties?

And what do we have for fluorescence/phosphorescence in the visible-light range, i.e., absorb violet and emit red.

So far I only have organic compounds, what about for inorganic compounds?

Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by Poutnik, Mithoron, Todd Minehardt
Mod Moved Comments To Chat
Trying Poutnik's suggestion...
Added to review
Link

What are some compounds that do fluorescence but not phosphorescence, phosphorescence but not Compounds with fluorescence, and do both?/or phosphorescence

Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by Mithoron, Todd Minehardt, Jannis Andreska
Clarification.
Added to review
Source Link
Loading
Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by Mathew Mahindaratne, Jon Custer, Jannis Andreska
Trying Mithoron's advice...
Added to review
Source Link
Loading
Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by Poutnik, Jannis Andreska, Mithoron
Clarified.
Added to review
Source Link
Loading
Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by Mathew Mahindaratne, Jannis Andreska, Mithoron
deleted 167 characters in body
Added to review
Source Link
Loading
Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by Jannis Andreska, Todd Minehardt, Mathew Mahindaratne
added 270 characters in body
Added to review
Source Link
Loading
Left closed in review as "Needs more focus" by Mithoron, Jannis Andreska, Todd Minehardt
added 79 characters in body
Added to review
Source Link
Loading
Left closed in review as "Original close reason(s) were not resolved" by Jannis Andreska, Mithoron, Todd Minehardt
Looks like there is a pattern, so people who said there is no pattern are false.
Added to review
Source Link
Loading