Timeline for What are disadvantages of methane or ammonia compared to dihydrogen for metal ore reduction?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 22, 2023 at 17:07 | comment | added | tobalt | @Stian Ok maybe "irrelevant" was the wrong term. What I mean is that these paragraphs contain no substance because they tell trivial truths. Thanks for now adding this substance :) I think, however, that you try to make a point in case of Carbon vs any of those replacements. But the question is about CH4/NH3 vs H2. | |
Jul 22, 2023 at 14:44 | history | edited | Stian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1185 characters in body
|
Jul 22, 2023 at 13:58 | comment | added | Stian | @tobalt the second last paragraph is a direct answer to your why not, and the last one is my personal quest to educate the servile masses in using the word 'green' sparingly. But I will elucidate once I am back on my laptop, writing equations is too arduous on a mobile device. | |
Jul 22, 2023 at 7:07 | comment | added | tobalt | Would you consider removing the last two irrelevant paragraphs and maybe instead elaborate why solid reactants (I guess) are favorable in terms of reaction economics to gaseous ones? | |
Jul 20, 2023 at 21:30 | comment | added | Karl | The actual reduction agent in a classical blast furnace is CO. You're right with the rest of what you say. ;) | |
Jul 20, 2023 at 13:04 | history | answered | Stian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |