Timeline for How to estimate the temperature needed to overcome an activation energy barrier?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 9, 2021 at 19:01 | history | edited | M.L | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 436 characters in body
|
Jul 9, 2021 at 15:39 | comment | added | Martin - マーチン♦ | I've linked a question (above) that covers some more ground, have a look at that maybe it inspires you to improve/include some points. I think making sure that a reader will see the approximate nature of what you have written is important. The numbers at the end are just too tempting if taken at face value. Other than that, I think your answer is still fine; especially the part with the "hundred year" half-life. | |
Jul 8, 2021 at 6:05 | history | edited | M.L | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
Jul 8, 2021 at 6:03 | comment | added | M.L | @Martin-マーチン Yes, I forgot to take that into account. I'm not an expert in this area but what do you think I could say to fix my answer? Should I say that we assume delta G is independent of temperature? | |
Jul 8, 2021 at 2:56 | comment | added | S R Maiti | @M.L. Note that you are actually dealing with the change in the Gibbs free energy ($\Delta G$) not the absolute value of Gibbs free energy ($G$) here. | |
Jul 8, 2021 at 0:00 | history | edited | Martin - マーチン♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 117 characters in body
|
Jul 7, 2021 at 23:56 | comment | added | Martin - マーチン♦ | G_a is temperature dependent; it'll rise with rising temperature. Other reactions possibly take over in the meantime. Anything > 100 kJ/mol and STP needs a bit more persuasion. As for DFT, without calibration, up to 80 kJ/mol gives you a guesstimate but nothing more. | |
Jul 6, 2021 at 6:19 | history | edited | M.L | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added some information and calculations while fixing some typos.
|
Jul 6, 2021 at 4:11 | history | answered | M.L | CC BY-SA 4.0 |