Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If the rate constant depends on the concentration of something, it is not a rate constant. $\endgroup$
    – Maurice
    Commented Dec 2, 2020 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ Then how would you define rate constant where the rate determining step can change if the concentration of one component is changed to a large extent? $\endgroup$
    – S R Maiti
    Commented Dec 2, 2020 at 22:09
  • $\begingroup$ TST is a crude approximation. It works only for elementary steps, only for the defined potential hyper surface. If you change the concentrations, you change the surface, the approximation breaks. P.S.: Please don't use mhchem for non-chemistry items. $\endgroup$ Commented May 13, 2021 at 17:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin-マーチン Thank you. So what happens to the rate constant then? It changes, right? $\endgroup$
    – S R Maiti
    Commented May 13, 2021 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ If with "change" you mean it was once that and became that, then: no. If with "change" you mean it is completely different and has absolutely no relationship with anything else, then: yes. That includes the cases, where that rate appears to be equal. I think I need to stress that again: TST only ever works for a single, well defined potential hyper surface. $\endgroup$ Commented May 13, 2021 at 17:57