Skip to main content
added 30 characters in body
Source Link
user7951
user7951

It is a common textbook question to treat the root mean square velocities of an ideal gas as given by the following equation: $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$$$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$ I was wondering about the validity of this equation, particularly as it applies to gases that are not monatomic. For example, in the following question from Zumdahl et al., it says:

Calculate the root mean square velocities of $\ce{CH4}$ and $\ce{N2}$ molecules at $\pu{273 K and 546 K}$$\pu{273 K}$ and $\pu{546 K}$.

The answer key gives $\pu{652m/s}$$\pu{652 m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{273K}$$\pu{273 K}$, $\pu{493m/s}$$\pu{493 m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{273 K}$, $\pu{922m/s}$$\pu{922 m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{546 K}$, and $\pu{697 m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{546 K}$. These were all calculated with the equation $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$$$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$

Why is this equation valid for all ideal gases? Shouldn't it be- $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}} \text{ for methane}$$$$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}} \text{ for methane}$$ (because there are $3$ rotational degrees of freedom in addition to $3$ translational degrees of freedom), and - $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}} \text{ for nitrogen}$$$$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}} \text{ for nitrogen}$$ (because there are 2$2$ rotational degrees of freedom)?

If my thoughts are not true, then why is it commonly reported that the average molar specific heat of an ideal monatomic gas (at constant volume) is $3/2RT$, that of an ideal diatomic gas is $5/2RT$, and that of a nonlinear gas is $3RT$?

It is a common textbook question to treat the root mean square velocities of an ideal gas as given by the following equation: $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$ I was wondering about the validity of this equation, particularly as it applies to gases that are not monatomic. For example, in the following question from Zumdahl et al., it says:

Calculate the root mean square velocities of $\ce{CH4}$ and $\ce{N2}$ molecules at $\pu{273 K and 546 K}$.

The answer key gives $\pu{652m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{273K}$, $\pu{493m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{273 K}$, $\pu{922m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{546 K}$, and $\pu{697 m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{546 K}$. These were all calculated with the equation $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$

Why is this equation valid for all ideal gases? Shouldn't it be- $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}} \text{ for methane}$$ (because there are $3$ rotational degrees of freedom in addition to $3$ translational degrees of freedom), and - $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}} \text{ for nitrogen}$$ (because there are 2 rotational degrees of freedom)?

If my thoughts are not true, then why is it commonly reported that the average molar specific heat of an ideal monatomic gas (at constant volume) is $3/2RT$, that of an ideal diatomic gas is $5/2RT$, and that of a nonlinear gas is $3RT$?

It is a common textbook question to treat the root mean square velocities of an ideal gas as given by the following equation: $$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$ I was wondering about the validity of this equation, particularly as it applies to gases that are not monatomic. For example, in the following question from Zumdahl et al., it says:

Calculate the root mean square velocities of $\ce{CH4}$ and $\ce{N2}$ molecules at $\pu{273 K}$ and $\pu{546 K}$.

The answer key gives $\pu{652 m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{273 K}$, $\pu{493 m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{273 K}$, $\pu{922 m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{546 K}$, and $\pu{697 m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{546 K}$. These were all calculated with the equation $$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$

Why is this equation valid for all ideal gases? Shouldn't it be $$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}} \text{ for methane}$$ (because there are $3$ rotational degrees of freedom in addition to $3$ translational degrees of freedom), and $$v_\text{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}} \text{ for nitrogen}$$ (because there are $2$ rotational degrees of freedom)?

If my thoughts are not true, then why is it commonly reported that the average molar specific heat of an ideal monatomic gas (at constant volume) is $3/2RT$, that of an ideal diatomic gas is $5/2RT$, and that of a nonlinear gas is $3RT$?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/1221855508451274753
Became Hot Network Question

It is a common textbook question to treat the root mean square velocities of an ideal gas as given by the following equation: $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$. I $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$ I was wondering about the validity of this equation, particularly as it applies to gases that are not monatomic. For example, in the following question from Zumdahl et al., it says:

Calculate the root mean square velocities of CH4$\ce{CH4}$ and N2$\ce{N2}$ molecules at 273 K and 546 K$\pu{273 K and 546 K}$.

The answer key gives $652 \text{ m/s}$$\pu{652m/s}$ for methane at 273 K$\pu{273K}$, $493 \text{ m/s}$$\pu{493m/s}$ for nitrogen at 273 K$\pu{273 K}$, $922 \text{ m/s}$$\pu{922m/s}$ for methane at 546 K$\pu{546 K}$, and $697 \text{ m/s}$$\pu{697 m/s}$ for nitrogen at 546 K$\pu{546 K}$. These were all calculated with the equation $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$.$$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$

Why is this equation valid for all ideal gases? Shouldn't it be- $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}}$ for methane$$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}} \text{ for methane}$$ (because there are 3$3$ rotational degrees of freedom in addition to 3$3$ translational degrees of freedom), and $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}}$ for nitrogen- $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}} \text{ for nitrogen}$$ (because there are 2 rotational degrees of freedom)?

If my thoughts are not true, then why is it commonly reported that the average molar specific heat of an ideal monatomic gas (at constant volume) is $3/2RT$, that of an ideal diatomic gas is $5/2RT$, and that of a nonlinear gas is $3RT$?

It is a common textbook question to treat the root mean square velocities of an ideal gas as given by the following equation: $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$. I was wondering about the validity of this equation, particularly as it applies to gases that are not monatomic. For example, in the following question from Zumdahl et al., it says:

Calculate the root mean square velocities of CH4 and N2 molecules at 273 K and 546 K.

The answer key gives $652 \text{ m/s}$ for methane at 273 K, $493 \text{ m/s}$ for nitrogen at 273 K, $922 \text{ m/s}$ for methane at 546 K, and $697 \text{ m/s}$ for nitrogen at 546 K. These were all calculated with the equation $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$.

Why is this equation valid for all ideal gases? Shouldn't it be $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}}$ for methane (because there are 3 rotational degrees of freedom in addition to 3 translational degrees of freedom), and $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}}$ for nitrogen (because there are 2 rotational degrees of freedom)?

If my thoughts are not true, then why is it commonly reported that the average molar specific heat of an ideal monatomic gas (at constant volume) is $3/2RT$, that of an ideal diatomic gas is $5/2RT$, and that of a nonlinear gas is $3RT$?

It is a common textbook question to treat the root mean square velocities of an ideal gas as given by the following equation: $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$ I was wondering about the validity of this equation, particularly as it applies to gases that are not monatomic. For example, in the following question from Zumdahl et al., it says:

Calculate the root mean square velocities of $\ce{CH4}$ and $\ce{N2}$ molecules at $\pu{273 K and 546 K}$.

The answer key gives $\pu{652m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{273K}$, $\pu{493m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{273 K}$, $\pu{922m/s}$ for methane at $\pu{546 K}$, and $\pu{697 m/s}$ for nitrogen at $\pu{546 K}$. These were all calculated with the equation $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$

Why is this equation valid for all ideal gases? Shouldn't it be- $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}} \text{ for methane}$$ (because there are $3$ rotational degrees of freedom in addition to $3$ translational degrees of freedom), and - $$v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}} \text{ for nitrogen}$$ (because there are 2 rotational degrees of freedom)?

If my thoughts are not true, then why is it commonly reported that the average molar specific heat of an ideal monatomic gas (at constant volume) is $3/2RT$, that of an ideal diatomic gas is $5/2RT$, and that of a nonlinear gas is $3RT$?

Source Link
Cyclopropane
  • 2.1k
  • 1
  • 25
  • 51

According to KMT, is the velocity of an ideal gas always sqrt(3RT/M)?

It is a common textbook question to treat the root mean square velocities of an ideal gas as given by the following equation: $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$. I was wondering about the validity of this equation, particularly as it applies to gases that are not monatomic. For example, in the following question from Zumdahl et al., it says:

Calculate the root mean square velocities of CH4 and N2 molecules at 273 K and 546 K.

The answer key gives $652 \text{ m/s}$ for methane at 273 K, $493 \text{ m/s}$ for nitrogen at 273 K, $922 \text{ m/s}$ for methane at 546 K, and $697 \text{ m/s}$ for nitrogen at 546 K. These were all calculated with the equation $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$.

Why is this equation valid for all ideal gases? Shouldn't it be $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{6RT}{M}}$ for methane (because there are 3 rotational degrees of freedom in addition to 3 translational degrees of freedom), and $v_{rms}=\sqrt{\frac{5RT}{M}}$ for nitrogen (because there are 2 rotational degrees of freedom)?

If my thoughts are not true, then why is it commonly reported that the average molar specific heat of an ideal monatomic gas (at constant volume) is $3/2RT$, that of an ideal diatomic gas is $5/2RT$, and that of a nonlinear gas is $3RT$?