Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

I was looking through the literature when I found a paper by Greenzaid et al. [1] which states that the equilibrium constant $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = [\text{hydrate}]/[\text{carbonyl}] = (\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w} - \varepsilon^\mathrm{w})/\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}, \label{eqn:1}\tag{1}$$

 

where $\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient measured under conditions of hydration, and $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient of the carbonyl compound in water in the absence of hydration.

(In water solvent, $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.)

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As $[\text{hydrate}]$ is equal to $[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}],$ the equation \eqref{eqn:1} turns to:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]}$$

However, the Beer–Lambert law states that

$$A = c\varepsilon l,$$

where $A$ is the optical density, $c$ is the concentration, $\varepsilon$ is the extinction coefficient and $l$ is the path length.

Denoting the corresponding parameters for carbonyl without hydration as $A_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$, and the parameters for carbonyl with hydration as $A$ and $\varepsilon$, the following can be written:

$$ \begin{align} K_\mathrm{hyd} &= \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0l} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon l}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon l}} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon}} \\ \therefore &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\left(\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}\right) \\ &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon\varepsilon_0} \\ &= \frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{A\varepsilon_0} \\ \end{align} $$

But we require

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{\varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon}{\varepsilon}$$

Shouldn't this mean that $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $1/\varepsilon$ values?

References

  1. Greenzaid, P.; Rappoport, Z.; Samuel, D. Limitations of Ultra-Violet Spectroscopy for the Study of the Reversible Hydration of Carbonyl Compounds. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1967, 63 (0), 2131–2139. DOI: 10.1039/TF9676302131.

I was looking through the literature when I found a paper by Greenzaid et al. [1] which states that the equilibrium constant $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = [\text{hydrate}]/[\text{carbonyl}] = (\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w} - \varepsilon^\mathrm{w})/\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}, \label{eqn:1}\tag{1}$$

 

where $\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient measured under conditions of hydration, and $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient of the carbonyl compound in water in the absence of hydration.

(In water solvent, $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.)

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As $[\text{hydrate}]$ is equal to $[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}],$ the equation \eqref{eqn:1} turns to:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]}$$

However, the Beer–Lambert law states that

$$A = c\varepsilon l,$$

where $A$ is the optical density, $c$ is the concentration, $\varepsilon$ is the extinction coefficient and $l$ is the path length.

Denoting the corresponding parameters for carbonyl without hydration as $A_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$, and the parameters for carbonyl with hydration as $A$ and $\varepsilon$, the following can be written:

$$ \begin{align} K_\mathrm{hyd} &= \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0l} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon l}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon l}} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon}} \\ \therefore &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\left(\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}\right) \\ &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon\varepsilon_0} \\ &= \frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{A\varepsilon_0} \\ \end{align} $$

But we require

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{\varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon}{\varepsilon}$$

Shouldn't this mean that $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $1/\varepsilon$ values?

References

  1. Greenzaid, P.; Rappoport, Z.; Samuel, D. Limitations of Ultra-Violet Spectroscopy for the Study of the Reversible Hydration of Carbonyl Compounds. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1967, 63 (0), 2131–2139. DOI: 10.1039/TF9676302131.

I was looking through the literature when I found a paper by Greenzaid et al. [1] which states that the equilibrium constant $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = [\text{hydrate}]/[\text{carbonyl}] = (\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w} - \varepsilon^\mathrm{w})/\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}, \label{eqn:1}\tag{1}$$

where $\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient measured under conditions of hydration, and $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient of the carbonyl compound in water in the absence of hydration.

(In water solvent, $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.)

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As $[\text{hydrate}]$ is equal to $[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}],$ the equation \eqref{eqn:1} turns to:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]}$$

However, the Beer–Lambert law states that

$$A = c\varepsilon l,$$

where $A$ is the optical density, $c$ is the concentration, $\varepsilon$ is the extinction coefficient and $l$ is the path length.

Denoting the corresponding parameters for carbonyl without hydration as $A_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$, and the parameters for carbonyl with hydration as $A$ and $\varepsilon$, the following can be written:

$$ \begin{align} K_\mathrm{hyd} &= \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0l} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon l}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon l}} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon}} \\ \therefore &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\left(\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}\right) \\ &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon\varepsilon_0} \\ &= \frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{A\varepsilon_0} \\ \end{align} $$

But we require

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{\varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon}{\varepsilon}$$

Shouldn't this mean that $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $1/\varepsilon$ values?

References

  1. Greenzaid, P.; Rappoport, Z.; Samuel, D. Limitations of Ultra-Violet Spectroscopy for the Study of the Reversible Hydration of Carbonyl Compounds. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1967, 63 (0), 2131–2139. DOI: 10.1039/TF9676302131.
Tweeted twitter.com/StackChemistry/status/1206589896309252096
Corrected cited text; OCRed handwritten part with MathJax
Source Link
andselisk
  • 38.4k
  • 14
  • 133
  • 222

I was looking through the literature when I found this source:

https://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlepdf/1967/tf/tf9676302131

Whicha paper by Greenzaid et al. [1] which states that the equilibrium constant Khyd$K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is:

Khyd = $\frac{[hydrate]}{[carbonyl]}$ = $\frac{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}} - \epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}}{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}} }$

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = [\text{hydrate}]/[\text{carbonyl}] = (\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w} - \varepsilon^\mathrm{w})/\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}, \label{eqn:1}\tag{1}$$

where $\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient measured under conditions of hydration, and $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient of the carbonyl compound in water in the absence of hydration.

Where $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient measured under conditions of hydration in water solvent and $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient of the carbonyl in the absence of hydration in(In water solvent, $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.)

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As [hydrate]$[\text{hydrate}]$ is equal to [carbonyl]0 - [carbonyl],$[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}],$ the equation \eqref{eqn:1} turns to:

Khyd = $\frac{[carbonyl]_{\mathrm{0}} -[carbonyl]}{[carbonyl]}$$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]}$$

However, the Beer-LambertBeer–Lambert law states that A = c$\epsilon$l

$$A = c\varepsilon l,$$

where $A$ is the optical density, $c$ is the concentration, $\varepsilon$ is the extinction coefficient and $l$ is the path length.

Denoting the corresponding parameters for carbonyl without hydration as $A_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$, and the parameters for carbonyl with hydration as $A$ and $\varepsilon$, the following can be written:

$$ \begin{align} K_\mathrm{hyd} &= \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0l} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon l}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon l}} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon}} \\ \therefore &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\left(\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}\right) \\ &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon\varepsilon_0} \\ &= \frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{A\varepsilon_0} \\ \end{align} $$

But we require

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{\varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon}{\varepsilon}$$

Shouldn't this mean that Hhyd$K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$$1/\varepsilon$ values?

EDIT: My current working is shown in the picture below:

References

  1. Greenzaid, P.; Rappoport, Z.; Samuel, D. Limitations of Ultra-Violet Spectroscopy for the Study of the Reversible Hydration of Carbonyl Compounds. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1967, 63 (0), 2131–2139. DOI: 10.1039/TF9676302131.

I was looking through the literature when I found this source:

https://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlepdf/1967/tf/tf9676302131

Which states that the equilibrium constant Khyd is:

Khyd = $\frac{[hydrate]}{[carbonyl]}$ = $\frac{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}} - \epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}}{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}} }$

Where $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient measured under conditions of hydration in water solvent and $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient of the carbonyl in the absence of hydration in water solvent, usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As [hydrate] is equal to [carbonyl]0 - [carbonyl], the equation turns to:

Khyd = $\frac{[carbonyl]_{\mathrm{0}} -[carbonyl]}{[carbonyl]}$

However the Beer-Lambert law states that A = c$\epsilon$l.

Shouldn't this mean that Hhyd is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ values?

EDIT: My current working is shown in the picture below:

I was looking through the literature when I found a paper by Greenzaid et al. [1] which states that the equilibrium constant $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = [\text{hydrate}]/[\text{carbonyl}] = (\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w} - \varepsilon^\mathrm{w})/\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}, \label{eqn:1}\tag{1}$$

where $\varepsilon^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient measured under conditions of hydration, and $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ is the molar absorption coefficient of the carbonyl compound in water in the absence of hydration.

(In water solvent, $\varepsilon_0^\mathrm{w}$ usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.)

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As $[\text{hydrate}]$ is equal to $[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}],$ the equation \eqref{eqn:1} turns to:

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]}$$

However, the Beer–Lambert law states that

$$A = c\varepsilon l,$$

where $A$ is the optical density, $c$ is the concentration, $\varepsilon$ is the extinction coefficient and $l$ is the path length.

Denoting the corresponding parameters for carbonyl without hydration as $A_0$ and $\varepsilon_0$, and the parameters for carbonyl with hydration as $A$ and $\varepsilon$, the following can be written:

$$ \begin{align} K_\mathrm{hyd} &= \frac{[\text{carbonyl}]_0 - [\text{carbonyl}]}{[\text{carbonyl}]} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0l} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon l}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon l}} \\ &= \frac{\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}}{\frac{A}{\varepsilon}} \\ \therefore &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\left(\frac{A_0}{\varepsilon_0} - \frac{A}{\varepsilon}\right) \\ &= \frac{\varepsilon}{A}\frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon\varepsilon_0} \\ &= \frac{A_0\varepsilon - A\varepsilon_0}{A\varepsilon_0} \\ \end{align} $$

But we require

$$K_\mathrm{hyd} = \frac{\varepsilon_0 - \varepsilon}{\varepsilon}$$

Shouldn't this mean that $K_\mathrm{hyd}$ is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $1/\varepsilon$ values?

References

  1. Greenzaid, P.; Rappoport, Z.; Samuel, D. Limitations of Ultra-Violet Spectroscopy for the Study of the Reversible Hydration of Carbonyl Compounds. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1967, 63 (0), 2131–2139. DOI: 10.1039/TF9676302131.
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
Bumped by Community user
added 99 characters in body
Source Link
K.P.
  • 239
  • 1
  • 3
  • 8

I was looking through the literature when I found this source:

https://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlepdf/1967/tf/tf9676302131

Which states that the equilibrium constant Khyd is:

Khyd = $\frac{[hydrate]}{[carbonyl]}$ = $\frac{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}} - \epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}}{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}} }$

Where $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient measured under conditions of hydration in water solvent and $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient of the carbonyl in the absence of hydration in water solvent, usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As [hydrate] is equal to [carbonyl]0 - [carbonyl], the equation turns to:

Khyd = $\frac{[carbonyl]_{\mathrm{0}} -[carbonyl]}{[carbonyl]}$

However the Beer-Lambert law states that A = c$\epsilon$l.

Shouldn't this mean that Hhyd is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ values?

EDIT: My current working is shown in the picture below:

I was looking through the literature when I found this source:

https://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlepdf/1967/tf/tf9676302131

Which states that the equilibrium constant Khyd is:

Khyd = $\frac{[hydrate]}{[carbonyl]}$ = $\frac{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}} - \epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}}{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}} }$

Where $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient measured under conditions of hydration in water solvent and $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient of the carbonyl in the absence of hydration in water solvent, usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As [hydrate] is equal to [carbonyl]0 - [carbonyl], the equation turns to:

Khyd = $\frac{[carbonyl]_{\mathrm{0}} -[carbonyl]}{[carbonyl]}$

However the Beer-Lambert law states that A = c$\epsilon$l.

Shouldn't this mean that Hhyd is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ values?

I was looking through the literature when I found this source:

https://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlepdf/1967/tf/tf9676302131

Which states that the equilibrium constant Khyd is:

Khyd = $\frac{[hydrate]}{[carbonyl]}$ = $\frac{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}} - \epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}}{\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}} }$

Where $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient measured under conditions of hydration in water solvent and $\epsilon^{\mathrm{W}}_{\mathrm{0}}$ is the molar extinction coefficient of the carbonyl in the absence of hydration in water solvent, usually taken as the molar extinction coefficient in cyclohexane.

How did the researchers get to the above equation in terms of the molar absorption coefficients?

As [hydrate] is equal to [carbonyl]0 - [carbonyl], the equation turns to:

Khyd = $\frac{[carbonyl]_{\mathrm{0}} -[carbonyl]}{[carbonyl]}$

However the Beer-Lambert law states that A = c$\epsilon$l.

Shouldn't this mean that Hhyd is actually proportional to a fraction containing the $\frac{1}{\epsilon}$ values?

EDIT: My current working is shown in the picture below:

added 268 characters in body
Source Link
K.P.
  • 239
  • 1
  • 3
  • 8
Loading
Source Link
K.P.
  • 239
  • 1
  • 3
  • 8
Loading