Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ Ok thanks for the insights that you have provided. Could I just clarify: do you mean to say that hyperconjugative interactions do not really occur at larger distances since the region of donor electron density would be further away and thus, such interactions would be largely insignificant? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27, 2018 at 10:39
  • $\begingroup$ Also, by your electronegativity difference argument, wouldn't C-H be a better donor than C-C? And this seems to contradict what you wrote. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27, 2018 at 10:41
  • $\begingroup$ @TanYongBoon Yes the distance is a crucial parameter for orbital overlapping, even for hyperconjugation. Concerning which is the best donnor between C-H and C-C, the tendency I wrote is just an commonly accepted tendency. I would not be able to give an explanation about it. It might be due to the diffusion difference between H orbital compared to C orbital... $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4, 2018 at 8:20