Conversation started Nov 5, 2015 at 17:45.
Nov 5, 2015 5:45 PM
@Kyll You realize it's quite possible for a post to be NAA, VLQ, Spam and Offensive, right?
@Shog9 Plop!
It's been great knowing you'all guys
3
@Kyll Are you leaving?
He's about to be given a concrete overcoat by Shog9 :)
@NathanOliver I don't know T.T
As a technical matter, NAA and VLQ mostly do the same thing behind the scenes (although they're evaluated slightly differently in edge cases) and the same applies to Spam and Rude/Offensive
Nov 5, 2015 5:46 PM
Oh, Ah, Went right over my head
So, pick the flag that seems most right to you. A consensus will emerge and the matter will be handled appropriately.
@Shog9 Well, contrary to close votes consensus is pretty much invisible to us
True, but you can tell if the flag is approved or declined, and whether the post is deleted or left.
Wouldn't a more uniformly applied rule ease the handling process of such posts?
Not really
Nov 5, 2015 5:48 PM
Okay, does that mean I can pick a random flag (except custom) each time I flag gibberish? Because if it means that I am going to be very happy.
I guess we just wanted to know how best to handle a gibberish post without giving the overworked mods even more stuff to do unless that's the best way to do it.
Handling them boils down to
Delete?
 |    Yes -> Delete with penalty -> Yes
 |                     |
 v                    v
No                 No
so much for ascii flowcharts
you got one critical choice regardless of flag
Random voting it is \o/
Okay. I know I ws just looking for what is most appropriate for answers with ;dlfnad;gna;eohaag;lg
@DavidG doesn't really matter. If it looks spammy, spam-flag it. If it looks rude/abusive/offensive, use that flag. Otherwise use whichever VLQ/NAA you can hit first.
4
Nov 5, 2015 5:51 PM
^ Speaking of NAA
@NathanOliver if it's a new user, that's probably abuse. If it's not, their cat probably sat on the keyboard.
Damn cats
So that means we should go for spam/offensive to destroy the content with spam accumulation?
@Kyll if that's plausible, sure. If it looks like the cat thing, then no - NAA would suffice.
A good criteria would then be a no-badge 1 rep user then
Nov 5, 2015 5:53 PM
if it's a new user, it doesn't matter (and spam is plausible). If it's someone who has reasonable posts elsewhere, then that spam flag will be declined because it'd mess them up for what was probably an innocent mistake.
Trivia: at one point, spam/offensive were the only flags in the system, so we used them for everything (also, there was no concept of a declined flag). The other flag types were added mostly for the benefit of the flaggers.
3
I get it now. Thanks a lot for the info!
Yeah, that's really helpful, ty
Thanks for the explanation.
I like the differentiation between new and existing user, though I think these have all been new.
 
Conversation ended Nov 5, 2015 at 17:57.