Timeline for How to interpret the rolling resistance results from bicyclesrollingresistance.com for tires with very different tread patterns?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6 at 18:05 | history | edited | oscu0 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
| S May 6 at 18:03 | history | suggested | Michael come lately | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Make the important lists into bullets.
|
| May 6 at 17:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 6 at 18:03 | |||||
| May 3 at 14:12 | comment | added | oscu0 | €60 is not mid range, it’s high end price-wise. By mediocre I mean their speed to grip ratio is in my opinion unfavorable. I think Continental makes better, and cheaper, mid range tires (the Terras), although I can’t speak to their puncture protection. Puncture protection is inherently at odds with rolling resistance. | |
| May 3 at 12:14 | comment | added | Rеnаud | Just a curiosity, but if Michelin Power Gravel/Adventure tires are "lower-end" and "mediocre", what would you consider even a mid-range tire? These are tires with a €60 RRP, on par on many metrics with "Pro" tires of Specialized, SpeedGrip G-One's, Pirelli Cinturato's,... - sure, they are not top performers in all metrics, but it is to be expected for generalist products with good puncture resistance scores. | |
| May 3 at 0:06 | history | edited | oscu0 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| May 3 at 0:01 | history | answered | oscu0 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |