Timeline for Is Lemond's saddle height method outdated?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19 at 13:35 | history | edited | Weiwen Ng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1951 characters in body
|
| Mar 18 at 23:37 | comment | added | Weiwen Ng | @R.Chung Thanks, interesting article. Ungated version here. It covers, wow, estimation error, the fact that laypeople don't realize what prediction error is, the need for exercise pacing, heart rate recovery, etc. Also, the way they tell it, Haskell et al might actually not have run a regression on the computer, although they were basically estimating it visually. | |
| Mar 18 at 21:35 | history | edited | Weiwen Ng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 94 characters in body
|
| Mar 18 at 16:48 | comment | added | R. Chung | This NYT article includes a bit where the author asked Fox and Haskell where the "220-age" estimator came from. The answer is pretty amusing: nytimes.com/2001/04/24/health/… | |
| Mar 18 at 16:08 | history | edited | Weiwen Ng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1269 characters in body
|
| Mar 17 at 17:50 | history | edited | Weiwen Ng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 251 characters in body
|
| Mar 17 at 17:41 | history | answered | Weiwen Ng | CC BY-SA 4.0 |