Skip to main content
Bicycles

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

15
  • 3
    OMG those 'mudguards'!
    – Argenti Apparatus
    Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 19:35
  • 2
    And the first one is "dual-crown"!
    – Grigory Rechistov
    Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 20:11
  • 3
    @BlackThunder I'd say both are equally crappy. Get whatever looks better for you and don't expect much from it.
    – Klaster_1 Нет войне
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 4:34
  • 5
    @BlackThunder Cheap does not always mean crappy, but in this case, it unfortunately is. For mountain biking, both of these bikes are equally incapable and, let me be honest, dangerous. It might not be seen at the front suspension, but look at the rear "shock": it's just a spring in both cases! no oil camera, no nothing. It will bounce uncontrollably trying to throw a rider forward. You'd be better off with a hardtail. For road riding (e.g. commuting), both of these bikes weigh excessively and have too many components to maintain. Again, a full rigid bike at the same price will be better.
    – Grigory Rechistov
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 6:32
  • 2
    The first one has radially laced wheels and disk brakes. If the brakes work at all, the wheels will self destruct when you use them.
    – ojs
    Commented Mar 2, 2019 at 9:15